Diabetes Mellitus: Are Diabetic Patients Immunocompromised?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keep@science
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diabetes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether diabetic patients can be classified as immunocompromised. Participants explore the implications of diabetes mellitus on immune function, considering various types of diabetes and their effects on the body.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the generalization that diabetic patients are immunocompromised, suggesting that it depends on individual health conditions and complications associated with diabetes.
  • Others argue that diabetes mellitus is primarily a metabolic disease and does not inherently imply an impaired immune system, contrasting it with conditions like AIDS or those undergoing immunosuppressive therapy.
  • One participant explains the differences between Type I and Type II diabetes, noting that while both can lead to complications, they do not necessarily indicate a compromised immune system.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that any disease, including diabetes, can compromise overall body function, including the immune system, over time.
  • Some participants highlight that diabetic patients may experience slower healing and higher infection rates, which could suggest an indirect compromise of immune function.
  • There is a discussion about whether the immune system's behavior during disease states should be considered as impaired or simply reactive, with differing interpretations of what constitutes an immunocompromised state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether diabetes should be classified as a condition that compromises the immune system. Multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between diabetes and immune function.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of "immunocompromised" and how it applies to diabetes, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific definitions and interpretations of immune system function.

keep@science
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
is it right to say that "diabetic patients are immunocompromised "? if yes then why?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
keep@science said:
is it right to say that "diabetic patients are immunocompromised "? if yes then why?
That is too general or broad. It also depends on the conditions patients are suffering from e.g complex glycemic control in their bodies due to an increase of ketone level or those with vascular abnormalities and peripheral neuropathy.
 
Nope. DM is a metabolic disease characterized by a deficiency or dysfunction of insulin, hypoglycemic compound.

Immunocompromised patients refers to the body's own immune system (AIDS, immunosuppressive therapy in transplant patients, etc).
 
Diabetes mellitus is not a single disease.

Type I diabetes involves the damaging of the Islets of Langerhans in the pancreas, such that insulin is either not produced at all or produced in limited quantities.
Current thinking posits an autoimmune response that damages the pancreas. There is evidence of a genetic component. Usual patients are prepubertal, but adults can develop the condition. Characterized by high blood glucose levels, and higher than normal A1C hemoglobin results.

Type II diabetes involves insulin resistance. The pancreas makes insulin, the receptor sites for insulin "get the message", cells do not respond so serum glucose levels remain high until the kidneys are able to reduce the level. Primary causes are environmental, largely a complex of dietary choices, total calories, low exercise levels, and obesity. It is believed there is a genetic component as well. Age of onset can be as low as 10 years of age. Very common in developed countries in older adults.

Either type poorly controlled results in tissue damage: retina (diabetic retinopathy), neuropathy, kidneys, vascular system, skin. Basically it means that the diabetic has a lower life expectancy compared to non-diabetics. We do not need more details here really.

So,answer: not immunocompromised unless you have a different, possibly non-standard definition.

http://www.webmd.com/diabetes/type-1-diabetes-guide/default.htm
http://www.webmd.com/diabetes/type-2-diabetes-guide/type-2-diabetes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo and berkeman
Yes. Because, most diseases also fit into that category. Anything that is detrimental to the body enough to be called a disease compromises the function of the entire body over time, that also includes the immune system. Diseases should not be thought of as occurring in isolation from the rest of the system, it can affect the whole.
 
I think we disagree. The immune system may be in "high gear" during many illnesses, and some of the pathology of diseases results from the immune system "overreacting". Immunocompromised:
having an impaired immune system.
Example: HIV infections attacking the immune system.

I would interpret impaired as as synonymous with 'turned off' or only working partially.

Edit
Prednisone is prescribed after eye surgery. Why? to prevent damage from post-surgical inflammation.
Is this a compromised immune system? No.
C-reactive protein (CRP) is known to be a mediator for coronary plaque buildup. CRP is part of inflammation, which is part of the immune system. Are Myocardial infarctions the the result of immunodeficiency or an impaired immune system? No.

AFAIK type 1 diabetes is in the same category - except it is labelled autoimmune. Part of the pancreas in inflamed and badly damaged. Type 2 has less to with with the immune system and more to do with environmental factors.

So I think behavior of the immune system when we perceive it to be overreacting are pathology, or at least totally unwanted, definitely. But not an impaired system at all.
 
Last edited:
jim mcnamara said:
I think we disagree.

How so? If all people have a perfectly operating immune system, then disease should never occur- the immune system protects us from getting a disease. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with defining *many* diseases as also having a compromised immune system.

People with diabetes should be considered immunocompromised. It is well-known that patients with this disease should avoid cuts to the extremities, as there is a higher rate of infection and slower healing time for diabetic patients. Gangrene is also a threat. People with this should be aware that their immune system doesn't function like the average persons, a result of the disease limiting the circulation needed for healing, so that they take more precaution in preventing infections! Do you tell an elderly person with diabetes to not worry when the little cut on their foot is taking too long to heal or showing signs of gangrene- or do you caution them to keep an eye on it? Regardless of whether they qualify for the label of an autoimmune disorder or not, they should be aware that the disease indirectly compromises functions in other systems in the body, however slight it may be.
 
jim mcnamara said:
I think we disagree.

Fervent Freyja said:
How so?

It sounds like any 'disagreement' revolves around whether the immune system is part of the cause or part of the effect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K