Diagonalize a coupled damped driven oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on diagonalizing a coupled damped driven oscillator as described in the paper linked by the user. The user attempts to solve the equation of motion, specifically equation 3, by proposing a solution of the form x=Ae^{iωt}, where ω is the driving frequency. The user identifies a mistake in their interpretation of the equation and realizes that neglecting the damping term (γ) leads to correct eigenvalue expressions. The transformation matrix U is highlighted as essential for normal mode analysis, which decouples the equations of motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled oscillators and their dynamics
  • Familiarity with eigenvalue problems in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of normal mode analysis techniques
  • Basic concepts of driven damped systems in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of diagonalizing coupled oscillators in detail
  • Learn about the implications of damping in oscillatory systems
  • Explore normal mode analysis and its applications in physics
  • Review the mathematical techniques for solving differential equations in driven systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineering students, and researchers interested in classical mechanics, particularly those studying oscillatory systems and their behaviors under damping and driving forces.

jamie.j1989
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to follow a paper, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.0710v1.pdf, I want to get the results obtained in equations 5 and 6 but can't quite work out how eq 3 has been diagonalized.

Homework Equations


eq 3

The Attempt at a Solution


As the system is driven i thought I'd try a solution first and then try to rearrange into an eigenvalue problem. I tried the solution ##x=Ae^{i\omega t}## where ##\omega## is the driving frequency and A some constant, I tried this solution as the system will oscillate at the driving frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that eq 3 (in the [ ] at the beginning) should be \frac{d^2}{dt^2} + \gamma \frac{d}{dt} + \Omega^2 _0
 
I didn't even notice that mistake and have been reading it as you have corrected. Would you suggest trying a solution and rearranging is the best method?
 
on further review, maybe they don't treat the damping initially, \gamma doesn't appear in the diagonalized matrix...
 
Yes you're right, if i don't consider damping I get the correct expressions for the eigenvalues, why would they not include the damping term? Also I'm struggling to understand the transformation matrix U, Is this a rotating frame transformation?
 
U allows for a normal mode analysis..., thus decoupling the equations of motion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
566
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K