Diagonalize a coupled damped driven oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around diagonalizing a coupled damped driven oscillator as described in a referenced paper. The original poster is attempting to understand how a specific equation from the paper has been diagonalized to obtain results related to the system's dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers using a solution involving oscillatory behavior at the driving frequency and questions the method of rearranging it into an eigenvalue problem. Other participants discuss the implications of damping in the equations and whether it was initially treated in the diagonalization process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the implications of damping on the eigenvalues and the transformation matrix involved in the analysis. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the role of damping and the transformation matrix in the context of normal mode analysis, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the treatment of the damping term in the diagonalized matrix, and participants are questioning the assumptions made in the original paper regarding this aspect.

jamie.j1989
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to follow a paper, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.0710v1.pdf, I want to get the results obtained in equations 5 and 6 but can't quite work out how eq 3 has been diagonalized.

Homework Equations


eq 3

The Attempt at a Solution


As the system is driven i thought I'd try a solution first and then try to rearrange into an eigenvalue problem. I tried the solution ##x=Ae^{i\omega t}## where ##\omega## is the driving frequency and A some constant, I tried this solution as the system will oscillate at the driving frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that eq 3 (in the [ ] at the beginning) should be \frac{d^2}{dt^2} + \gamma \frac{d}{dt} + \Omega^2 _0
 
I didn't even notice that mistake and have been reading it as you have corrected. Would you suggest trying a solution and rearranging is the best method?
 
on further review, maybe they don't treat the damping initially, \gamma doesn't appear in the diagonalized matrix...
 
Yes you're right, if i don't consider damping I get the correct expressions for the eigenvalues, why would they not include the damping term? Also I'm struggling to understand the transformation matrix U, Is this a rotating frame transformation?
 
U allows for a normal mode analysis..., thus decoupling the equations of motion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
961
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K