Diagonalizing a 3x3 Matrix: Troubleshooting the P-1AP = D Expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter F1fan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on diagonalizing a 3x3 matrix and troubleshooting the expression P-1AP = D. The matrix in question has eigenvalues of 12, -12, and -8, with corresponding eigenvectors that are linearly independent. The user initially struggles to achieve a diagonal matrix D despite constructing matrix P from the eigenvectors. Clarifications reveal that the correct construction of P and its inverse P-1 is crucial for successful diagonalization. Ultimately, the user is encouraged to revisit their matrix multiplication skills to resolve the issue.
F1fan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have to diagonalize this matrix and I've found the eigenvalues and vectors and they're linearly independent but I can't get the expression P-1AP = D to work.

It's a 3x3 matrix, (-11,-46,-3),(0,12,0),(-1,-2,-9) with eigenvalues of 12,-12 and [STRIKE]8[/STRIKE] -8.
The eigenvectors are (-2,1,0), (3,0,1) and (-1,0,1).

The (P) I made was using the vectors but D is never a diagonal matrix am I missing something?

Edited to correct typo.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Did you make the columns of P (not the rows) out of the eigenvectors? What did you get for P-1?
 


vela said:
Did you make the columns of P (not the rows) out of the eigenvectors? What did you get for P-1?

My matrix P was (-2,3,-1), (1,0,0), (0,1,1)
 


P-1AP comes out diagonal here with that matrix.
 


IF you say it's diagonal than my matrix multiplication skills must be in need of help... I'll try again and see. Thanks for your help!
 


I get the third eigenvalue to be -8, not 8 as you showed. That wouldn't have made a difference in your calculation of P and P-1 though.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K