Diagonalizing by Unitary Similarity Transformation

In summary: It is suppose to be a Hermitian matrix. They both should be -1, sorry about that. And I believe I have an approximate answer. I believed I just changed the way I did it and use the face that for a unility matrix that U-dagger =U-1 and it was much cleaner output. Thanks for your help!
  • #1
Thadis
44
0

Homework Statement



Compute the inverse, eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the following matrix, M.
Are the eigenvectors orthogonal? Determine a unitary similarity transformation
matrix U such that U-1MU is diagonal.With M being

{2, 0, 2i, 0, 1}
{0, -1, 0,-2i,0}
{-2i, 0, 1, 1, 1}
{ 0, 2i, 1, 0,1}
{1, 0, 1, -1,-1}

Homework Equations


I know for that you are able to diagonalize real matrices by creating a matrix of the eigenvectors.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried solving this problem using Mathmatica by creating a matrix from the eigenvectors then inversing that matrix and using the U-1MU identity to see if I get a diagonal matrix but I end up not getting a diagonal matrix. I also have tried orthogonalizing the eigenvector matrix to see if that was a problem but it did not seem to work. Does anyone have anything that might help me understand how to do this problem and also the logic behide the steps? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thadis said:

Homework Statement



Compute the inverse, eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the following matrix, M.
Are the eigenvectors orthogonal? Determine a unitary similarity transformation
matrix U such that U-1MU is diagonal.With M being

{2, 0, 2i, 0, 1}
{0, -1, 0,-2i,0}
{-2i, 0, 1, 1, 1}
{ 0, 2i, 1, 0,1}
{1, 0, 1, -1,-1}

Homework Equations


I know for that you are able to diagonalize real matrices by creating a matrix of the eigenvectors.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried solving this problem using Mathmatica by creating a matrix from the eigenvectors then inversing that matrix and using the U-1MU identity to see if I get a diagonal matrix but I end up not getting a diagonal matrix. I also have tried orthogonalizing the eigenvector matrix to see if that was a problem but it did not seem to work. Does anyone have anything that might help me understand how to do this problem and also the logic behide the steps? Thank you!
I notice that the matrix is nearly Hermitian. Do ##m_{45}## and ##m_{54}## have the right signs? In either case, it doesn't look like you get very nice answers for the eigenvalues from what I see from Mathematica.
 
  • #3
vela said:
I notice that the matrix is nearly Hermitian. Do ##m_{45}## and ##m_{54}## have the right signs? In either case, it doesn't look like you get very nice answers for the eigenvalues from what I see from Mathematica.

Yeah, I agree. I tried changing it both ways and I still don't get a characteristic polynomial I can factor or anything. But either way including the nonhermitian initial form, I still get 5 distinct eigenvalues. So with the right computer tools you should be able to get an approximate diagonalization. I know I don't have the right tools.
 
  • #4
vela said:
I notice that the matrix is nearly Hermitian. Do ##m_{45}## and ##m_{54}## have the right signs? In either case, it doesn't look like you get very nice answers for the eigenvalues from what I see from Mathematica.

It is suppose to be a Hermitian matrix. They both should be -1, sorry about that. And I believe I have an approximate answer. I believed I just changed the way I did it and use the face that for a unility matrix that U-dagger =U-1 and it was much cleaner output. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
876
Replies
2
Views
800
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top