Did Anyone Create an Anti-Hydrogen Beam?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LightningInAJar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 1K views
LightningInAJar
Messages
289
Reaction score
38
TL;DR
Anti-hydrogen beam??
Did anyone ever create a beam of anti-hydrogen to see if antimatter reverses the direction of time?
 
  • Skeptical
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, weirdoguy, PeroK and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
LightningInAJar said:
to see if antimatter reverses the direction of time?

Why would it? And what does that even mean? I think I know where you got this idea from, but let's see if you understood what you read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Indeed there are investigations on antihydrogen, e.g., at CERN. The most recent news I know of is that the spectrum looks as expected the same as for usual hydrogen.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2006-5 (open access!)

Why it should reverse the direction of time, is an enigma to me. Nobody ever claimed that antimatter reverses the direction of time in any way. If you are referring to the "Feynman-Stueckelberg trick" this is not "particles moving backwards in time", as is often claimed in popular-science writing, but it's simply to put a creation operator instead of an annihilation operator in the mode decomposition of the (free-)field operators in order to get a local realization of the proper orthochronous Poincare group without violating the demand to have a Hamiltonian bounded from below (after proper choice of the vacuum energy to be 0 a positive definite Hamiltonian).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LightningInAJar and etotheipi
Beams of antiprotons have been used routinely for decades. The Tevatron for example collided protons and antiprotons.

In the calculations antiparticles have some similarity to particles if you exchange the time direction in the calculations (that's the laypeople-friendly explanation of what vanhees wrote), but that doesn't make anything go backwards in time.
An object thrown up has a mathematical similarity to an object falling down with reversed time direction, but that doesn't mean a ball starts time traveling if you throw it upwards.
 
Well, as far as I know, the anti-matter-free-fall experiment hasn't been done yet, but I'm pretty sure it will come out what's predicted by GR (or Newtonian gravity for that matter): antiparticles are attracted as particles through the gravitational interaction.
 
Feel free to guess. I like the answers I'm getting. Maybe the presents of antimatter can slow the forward passage of time? Someone told me that we simply can't produce enough of it to get a noticeable difference?
 
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu, Vanadium 50, Motore and 1 other person
LightningInAJar said:
Feel free to guess.

I'm sorry, I mistook you for someone who wanted a serious conversation.

LightningInAJar said:
Maybe the presents of antimatter can slow the forward passage of time?

The presents? Are they wrapped with bows on them?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: phinds, Dale, jedishrfu and 2 others
LightningInAJar said:
if antimatter reverses the direction of time?
LightningInAJar said:
Feel free to guess.
LightningInAJar said:
Maybe the presents of antimatter can slow the forward passage of time? Someone told me that we simply can't produce enough of it to get a noticeable difference?

All of these are signs that this thread needs to be closed for being way too speculative and vague, not to mention based on a misconception from the start. I have heeded the signs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu and vanhees71