Did bad in undergrad EM. retake or directly go to grad EM?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to retake undergraduate Electromagnetism (EM) or to directly enroll in a graduate-level EM course. Participants explore the implications of past performance in EM, current mathematical skills, and the structure of the graduate course.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their poor performance in undergraduate EM and their lack of retention of the material, while their advisor suggests they might be ready for graduate EM if they excel in a mathematical physics class.
  • Another participant shares their experience of a challenging transition from undergraduate to graduate EM, noting the importance of being comfortable with solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and using Green functions.
  • A participant questions the feasibility of backing out of the graduate class if it becomes overwhelming, highlighting the importance of understanding one's own limits.
  • Several participants inquire about the specifics of the original poster's academic situation, including their current program, performance in previous courses, and retention of mathematical concepts.
  • One participant recounts their own struggles with complex topics in graduate EM, suggesting caution for those considering taking the course early.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for a solid foundation in mathematical techniques relevant to EM, suggesting that the original poster's current knowledge may be sufficient for a foothold in graduate-level material.
  • A metaphor is used to illustrate the potential risks of advancing to a more challenging course without adequate preparation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on whether the original poster should retake undergraduate EM or proceed to graduate EM. Some advocate for the latter based on current performance in mathematical physics, while others caution against it due to past difficulties and the challenges of graduate-level content. No consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various factors that could influence the decision, including the specific content and difficulty of the graduate EM course, the original poster's mathematical background, and the potential for dropping the course without significant penalties.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a transition from undergraduate to graduate-level physics courses, particularly in Electromagnetism, and those seeking advice on academic preparedness and course selection.

chill_factor
Messages
898
Reaction score
5
I did pretty bad in undergrad EM and remember nothing. However, my advisor says that since I'm doing well in my mathematical physics class, and if I get an A, I should directly take the grad EM course to not waste time. However, he acknowledges that I had difficulties with EM in the past, so wouldn't be opposed to me retaking undergrad EM. He also advised me that if I was to take the grad EM course it'll be best for me to work problems over the break to go over my weak points and get ready for the big boys league.

We're not using Jackson for the grad EM course; if we were I'm definitely going to retake undergrad EM. Instead we are using "Classical Electromagnetism" by Franklin. I looked at the book and it doesn't seem as brutal as Jackson, so I'm kind of thinking, should I risk it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's a bit hard for us to give you a good tip.
Look, at my university the system was really bad; we passed from Resnick-Halliday EM to Jackson (first half of the book, up to Magnetostatic) in 1 semester. No wonder that after 2 weeks there were only around 15 people remaining in the lectures out of 40 and eventually a few would do well up to the end. The mathematical methods course would be the semester that follows which is completely ridiculous.
Personally, if I were you, I would take the grad EM course if I felt confortable solving PDE's such as Laplace and the wave equation in spherical, cylindrical and Cartesian coordinates. Also knowing how to use Green functions to solve a problem in EM is probably important (I haven't checked out the book of Franklin). You should also know well Gauss's theorem and review several calculus vector identities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus_identities).
But you know yourself more than us and if you are able to quickly absorb a lot of new stuff then I'd go for it if I were you.
 
What are your options for backing out of the grad class if you are in over your head?
 
What country are you in? What university are you attending? Are you in a PhD program? Master's? How bad is "pretty bad?" What grade did you get? At what school? What does it mean that you "remember nothing?" Nothing beyond what you learned in a freshman survey?
 
When my graduate E&M class got to complex contour integrals and residues, I had to quit, and I did very well in undergraduate E&M. So, unless you're just trying to take the grad class "early," and there's no penalty for backing out and trying again, I'd say be careful.
 
bcrowell said:
What country are you in? What university are you attending? Are you in a PhD program? Master's? How bad is "pretty bad?" What grade did you get? At what school? What does it mean that you "remember nothing?" Nothing beyond what you learned in a freshman survey?

Also important: what mathematics do you still know/remember?
 
will be completing a grad level mathematical physics class; it covered complex analysis, non-Cartesian coordinate systems, vector and tensor analysis, and Green functions. Extremely struggling, but have a 80% average which is above class average.

no penalty if I don't take it yet, just need to within 2 years. if I can't handle it the advisor said just drop within 2 weeks and go to the undergrad class. I'd just lose the 50 dollars for the textbook.
 
did bad: below a B, even with a huge curve. remember nothing: all I know is plugging in formulas for electrostatics and knowing how to prove vector identities and using different gauges to make the Maxwell equations look like wave equations (this one was homework in the math class). anything that requires non-trivial physical setting up without nice symmetries or being told explicitly what to do is too hard. I plan to work a lot of problems in Griffith chapters 3-10 to catch up.
 
Last edited:
What you just described is probably fine for a foothold on Jackson, which was the standard ED text in final-year undergrad. Green function approaches, spherical vector harmonic expansions of plane waves, tensor analysis especially for the QFT groundwork... These are about as tough as it gets in courses using Jackson AFAIK. Sounds like you're fine.
 
  • #10
You know, if I was having difficulty learning to swim in 3 feet of water, I'm not sure that moving up to 8 feet of water would really help matters.

That said, your advisor probably knows both you and the course better than random people on the internet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K