moose
- 556
- 0
Astronuc, wouldn't that be interesting? Whoever gets Lieberman has the power in the Senate... So mostly to the democrats
moose said:Astronuc, wouldn't that be interesting? Whoever gets Lieberman has the power in the Senate... So mostly to the democrats
I think the one Independent is Bernie Sanders in VT, and Lieberman is a Dem, but has supported the administration on Defense and National Security.moose said:Astronuc, wouldn't that be interesting? Whoever gets Lieberman has the power in the Senate... So mostly to the democrats
But with things so close in the Senate though, anyone person could be significant, well other than the VP.Ivan Seeking said:One of the talking heads commented on the irony of this the other day: Lieberman could end up as the most important guy in Washington.
Gokul43201 said:Final Score in the Senate (my prediction) : 49 Dems, 49 Reps, 2 (Dem loyal) Inds
Astronuc said:I think the one Independent is Bernie Sanders in VT, and Lieberman is a Dem, but has supported the administration on Defense and National Security.
It will be interesting to see what the moderates of both parties do.
Astronuc said:But with things so close in the Senate though, anyone person could be significant, well other than the VP.
I expect it to continue shrinking until they start counting votes again in Silver Bow and Yellowstone. For some reason, it seems they haven't counted anything there in over two hours now!Astronuc said:Tester's lead is shrinking ~7500 votes with 70% of precincts reporting.
moose said:I just wonder if Bush will loosen up his grip on everything and allow some bills through. He could, afterall, just veto every single bill that comes to his desk...
Gokul in the OP said:Use this thread to report results as they come in!
Gokul43201 said:Ahem ... let's not get ahead of ourselves.
There's only 5500 votes left to count in Va.moose said:EDIT: Woah, in Virginia, Webb's lead is now down to 7239 votes! I guess this was just reported!
I've been looking at these for a while now and I'm certain that table is riddled with errors. Every other time I look at it, it seems they've got something wrong and have changed it.Tester's lead is now only 5500. It's still shrinking!
EDIT: Looking at Montana Counties which haven't been counted into the CNN thing yet, I am not sure who will win. This could get closer...
Hee hee, reminds me of an election in Canada some years ago where for the first few hours the marijuana party was actually leading the vote.moose said:California Proposition 85: Apparently, Californians believe that Parents or Guardians don't need to know if ahead of time if their child is to have a freaking abortion! (so yes, Parental Notification was voted down)
California Proposition 87:
Funds for Alternative Energy
Voted down, hmmm.
All efforts to legalize marijuana have failed. I am actually shocked at how close Nevada came to legalizing it though. Funny how in some states, smoking is being banned, and in others marijuana is almost passed.
Michigan will restrict affirmative action
Oregon also voted down a similar parental notification measure
"we did it guys!"moose said:Tester's lead is now only 5500. It's still shrinking!
EDIT: Woah, in Virginia, Webb's lead is now down to 7239 votes! I guess this was just reported!
EDIT: Looking at Montana Counties which haven't been counted into the CNN thing yet, I am not sure who will win. This could get closer...
EDIT3: Tester's lead grew slightly to 5639 votes
Webb's lead grew to 7380
But the fate of the Senate remained in doubt this morning, as races for Republican-held seats in Montana and Virginia remained too close to call as Election Day turned into the day after. Democrats would need both seats to win control of the Senate as well.
In Montana, Senator Conrad Burns, a Republican, was trailing Jon Tester, a Democrat, by a narrow margin. The race in Virginia — between another Republican incumbent, Senator George Allen, and Jim Webb, his Democratic challenger — was so close that some officials said it would have to be resolved by a recount.
That prospect could mean prolonged uncertainty over control of the Senate, since a recount can be requested only after the results are officially certified on Nov. 27th, according to the state board of elections. Last year a recount in the race for Attorney General was not resolved until Dec. 21
Well, I certainly jumped the gun on that one.Manchot said:As a Missourian, I'm extremely disappointed. Given that all the polls had suggested that the amendment enjoyed an overwhelming support (51% to 35%), it appears that the fundamentalists got out the vote. At the same time, McCaskill is currently losing by a surprising amount, suggesting that the same fundamentalists are influencing the Senate race as well.