MHB Did I Calculate the Length of the Parametric Curve Correctly?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the length of a parametric curve defined by the equations x=3t^2 and y=2t^3 over the interval 0≤t≤3. Initial calculations contained an error in the evaluation of the integral, specifically in squaring the derivative terms. After correcting the integral to L=6∫0^3 t√(1+t^2) dt, participants suggest using a substitution method to simplify the calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adjusting limits of integration when applying substitution. The final approach leads to a more straightforward evaluation of the integral.
ineedhelpnow
Messages
649
Reaction score
0
#1 find the length of the curve $x=3t^2$, $y=2t^3$, $0\le t \le 3$

$L=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta} \ \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^2+(\frac{dy}{dt})^2}dt$$\frac{dx}{dt}=6t$

$\frac{dy}{dt}=6t^2$$L=\int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{(6t)^2+(6t^2)^2}dt$
$=\int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{6t^2+6t^4}dt$
$=\int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{6t^2(1+t^2)}dt$
$=\int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{6t^2}dt + \int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{1+t^2}dt$$=(\frac{\sqrt{6}*t^2}{2})^3_0 + (\frac{\ln\left({\sqrt{t^2+1}+t}\right)}{2}+\frac{t\sqrt{t^2+1}}{2})^3_0$

did i do it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. In the second line of the calculation of $L$ -- $6^2 = 36$, not 6. So you should have

$L = \int_0^3 6\sqrt{t^2 (1 + t^2)} = 6 \int_0^3 t\sqrt{1+t^2}\, dt$.

Then you can use the u-sub $u = 1 + t^2$ to finish the rest.
 
Last edited:
oh that makes it way more simpler. thanks
 
$6 \int_{0}^{3} \ t\sqrt{1+t^2}dt$

$u=1+t^2$

$du=2t dt$

$dt=\frac{1}{2} du$$6 \int_{0}^{3} \ \frac{t\sqrt{u}}{2t}du$

$3 \int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{u}}du$

$3[\frac{2u^{3/2}}{3}]^3_0$

$3[\frac{2(1+t^2)^{3/2}}{3}]^3_0$

is that right?
 
ineedhelpnow said:
$6 \int_{0}^{3} \ t\sqrt{1+t^2}dt$

$u=1+t^2$

$du=2t dt$

$dt=\frac{1}{2} du$$6 \int_{0}^{3} \ \frac{t\sqrt{u}}{2t}du$

$3 \int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{u}}du$

$3[\frac{2u^{3/2}}{3}]^3_0$

$3[\frac{2(1+t^2)^{3/2}}{3}]^3_0$

is that right?

Yes, although there's no reason to keep those common factors there to make the calculation more difficult, write it as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2 \left[ \left( 1 + t^2 \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}} \right] _0^3 \end{align*}$...
 
ineedhelpnow said:
$6 \int_{0}^{3} \ t\sqrt{1+t^2}dt$

$u=1+t^2$

$du=2t dt$

$dt=\frac{1}{2} du$$6 \int_{0}^{3} \ \frac{t\sqrt{u}}{2t}du$

$3 \int_{0}^{3} \ \sqrt{u}}du$

$3[\frac{2u^{3/2}}{3}]^3_0$

$3[\frac{2(1+t^2)^{3/2}}{3}]^3_0$

is that right?

I would change the limits too in accordance with the substitution, and then be done with $t$ altogether. :D
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K