Did Paul Dirac say anything about Bohmian mechanics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Paul Dirac's views on Bohmian mechanics, specifically whether he commented on or engaged with the de Broglie-Bohm theory. The scope includes historical perspectives and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests references to any comments by Dirac regarding Bohmian mechanics.
  • Another participant questions whether Dirac ever expressed views on any interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  • Some participants suggest that Dirac, known for his pragmatic approach, likely adhered to the Copenhagen interpretation and may not have engaged deeply with interpretational issues.
  • There is speculation about the personal relationship between Dirac and Bohm, with one participant wondering if they discussed these topics despite Dirac's apparent lack of commentary.
  • One participant expresses surprise at the idea that Dirac did not reflect on foundational questions in physics, suggesting a belief that such reflections are integral to the discipline.
  • Another participant notes that Dirac's focus was on practical physics rather than interpretational debates, indicating a possible alignment with the collapse hypothesis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether Dirac commented on Bohmian mechanics, and there are competing views regarding his engagement with interpretational issues in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about Dirac's personal interactions with Bohm and the extent to which interpretational issues were considered central to physics during Dirac's time.

SVN
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Could you, please, give me reference to any paper or talk by Paul Dirac where he expresses his views about or give comments to the de Broglie-Bohm theory (Bohmian mechanics)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did he ever express any view about any interpretation?
 
I'd be surprised. He is a role model of a "no-nonsense physicist".
 
Did not he?

I'm a bit (a lot, actually) puzzled. Dirac was one of the leading theorists of his time. Can it be that he refrained from meditation over the very essence and core question of his discipline?

Anyway, he and Bohm lived in the same country for many years. Probably, they knew each other personally, met on many occasions and had conversations (I am not familiar with their biographies, just guessing). Is there any chance they bypassed this topic in their discussions?
 
The very essence and core questions of physics are not interpretational issues on quantum mechanics, which are rather on the boarder between physics and philosophy. Dirac was pretty pragmatic about it and took the standard Copenhagen interpretation of his time (to my dismay I learned in another thread, he even subscribed to the collapse hypothesis :-().
 
Okay, got it. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
25K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 235 ·
8
Replies
235
Views
26K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 491 ·
17
Replies
491
Views
40K