I Dielectric breakdown voltage of air vs. Electric field in thunderstorm

AI Thread Summary
The dielectric strength of air is approximately 3,000 kV, indicating the maximum electric field it can withstand before becoming conductive. Facilities like NASA's Kennedy Space Center use electric field mills to monitor electric field strength, suspending operations when it reaches a threshold between 1 kV and 3 kV, which seems contradictory given the high breakdown voltage of air. This lower threshold is likely due to real-world conditions such as humidity and the sharpness of structures, which can affect lightning behavior. Lightning is unpredictable, and a lower threshold allows for timely warnings. Understanding these factors is crucial for effective lightning protection measures.
ilovepudding
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The dielectric strength of air (ie the maximum electric field that the material can withstand under ideal conditions without undergoing electrical breakdown and becoming electrically conductive) is 3 000 kV ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_strength#Break_down_field_strength ).

In many articles I have read, some facilities that need lightning protection like NASA's Kennedy Space Center, electric field mills are used to measure the electric field's magnitude. When it reaches a certain threshold, there is a risk of lightning occurrence and so, all operations are suspended.

This threshold is usually situated between 1kV and 3kV ( https://www.vaisala.com/sites/defau...ric_field_mill_and_lightning_observations.pdf p : 4 ), and I find this really curious since air can't conduct electricity unless the electric field is 3000kV in normal conditions, which is not even close to the threshold chosen.

Is there any explanation for this apparent contradiction?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric field strength has units of V/m (or kV/m or MV/m), not Volts.

The 3MV/m number from Wikipedia is for dry air, so I'm guessing that you would set the threshold much lower under real conditions (high humidity, rain, etc.).
 
It also depends on the sharpness of the points on the structure. Sharp points create a stronger field. Lightning is unpredictable, and will sometimes strike low down on a tall structure, for instance. Conditions are likely to vary from minute to minute, so a lower threshold will give more warning.
 
@ilovepudding -- this thead is locked temporarily until you respond to my PM
 
berkeman said:
@ilovepudding -- this thead is locked temporarily until you respond to my PM
There has been no reply to my PM, but the issue was handled another way. Thread is re-opened.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top