Difference between brittle fracture and fatigue crack growth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differences between brittle fracture and fatigue crack growth in materials, specifically addressing the concepts of fracture toughness (KIC) and the Paris relation (da/dN = C ΔKm). When the stress intensity factor (K) exceeds KIC, crack propagation occurs, leading to material rupture. The conversation highlights the critical crack length applicable to both static and fatigue loading scenarios, emphasizing the importance of understanding these failure modes through historical examples such as the UK's Comet airliner and liberty ships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fracture mechanics, specifically KIC (fracture toughness)
  • Familiarity with the Paris relation for fatigue crack growth
  • Knowledge of static and fatigue loading concepts
  • Awareness of historical engineering failures related to crack propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of KIC in various materials under static loading conditions
  • Study the Paris law in detail, including its parameters and implications for fatigue analysis
  • Examine case studies of engineering failures due to brittle fracture and fatigue, such as the Comet airliner
  • Explore methods for improving material resistance to crack propagation, including design modifications
USEFUL FOR

Materials engineers, structural engineers, and anyone involved in the analysis and prevention of material failure due to crack propagation.

ehabmozart
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
My question here is regarding fracture of materials. I have problems in understanding some concepts. Now, for static loading, there is a property called KIC (fracture toughness). By equating our stress from the static load to this KIC, we get the maximum length of the crack which does not propagate. Above this length for this static loading, crack start propagating.

q1) What happens if our K becomes larger than K_IC? Does it rupture or the crack starts propagating?

Now, linking this to fatigue loading. In Paris relation, da/dN = C Δ Km. This is applicable for region II in the crack growth. As seen from the attached figure, region II it has two asymptotes along its sides. Stage I is the ΔKth. Here this threshold intensity factor is the point at which if we pass this threshold, the crack starts propagating.

q2) Can we link this figure to what is happening in the static failure. In other words, can we use a critical crack length which is common between them?

It would be better if I have a discussion group chat or something since this might save a lot of time and clear any confusion.
Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Physics.PNG
    Physics.PNG
    10.2 KB · Views: 683
Engineering news on Phys.org
My understanding is one parameter measures the failure of a steadily applied load, eg a notched-bar under increasing tension. The other is the resistance to failure when a lesser, 'working' load is repeatedly applied.

I suppose the classic example is the UK's Comet airliner where fatigue cracking at window corners destroyed several aircraft. This failure mode was proven by ground testing of a complete aircraft. After which, such corners were routinely rounded to prevent concentration of stress. Another engineering lesson bought in blood...
 
Nik_2213 said:
My understanding is one parameter measures the failure of a steadily applied load, eg a notched-bar under increasing tension. The other is the resistance to failure when a lesser, 'working' load is repeatedly applied.

I suppose the classic example is the UK's Comet airliner where fatigue cracking at window corners destroyed several aircraft. This failure mode was proven by ground testing of a complete aircraft. After which, such corners were routinely rounded to prevent concentration of stress. Another engineering lesson bought in blood...
And I believe an example of brittle fracture is the habit of the "liberty ships", which were welded construction, of breaking apart in low temperatures even when not highly loaded.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K