Difference between convergence of partial sum and series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between the convergence of a series, denoted as Ʃan, and the limit of its nth term, lim an as n→ ∞. It establishes that convergence refers to the sum of the series and its sequence of partial sums. Additionally, it highlights that while the convergence of a series implies that the added terms become infinitesimally small, this condition alone does not guarantee convergence, as illustrated by the counter-example Ʃ1/n.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series notation and convergence concepts
  • Familiarity with limits and sequences in calculus
  • Knowledge of partial sums and their significance
  • Basic grasp of counter-examples in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of convergent and divergent series
  • Learn about the concept of partial sums in detail
  • Explore the implications of the limit of a sequence
  • Investigate counter-examples in series convergence, focusing on Ʃ1/n
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of series convergence and its implications in mathematical analysis.

Teachme
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I am a little confused as to notation for convergence. I included a picture too.
If you take a look it says "then the series Ʃan is divergent"
Does the "Ʃan" just mean the convergence as to the sum of the series, or the lim an as n→ ∞ nth term?
I believe it is the sum of the series but I just want to make sure.

As for the physical meaning of Ʃan I think that's related to the area, but what is the physical meaning of taking the lim an as n→ ∞ for the nth term?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    10.6 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that when one talks about the convergence of a series Ʃan one is referring to the convergence of its sum, or put more eloquently, the convergence of its sequence of partial sums.

As for its physical interpretation, I'm not aware of any canonical physical interpretation of infinite series in general. However, if the series converges, that is to say if its sequence of partial sums converges, then the bits added to the sum must become infinitesimally small, although this is not a sufficient requirement for its convergence; the standard counter-example being Ʃ1/n.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K