I Difference Between Lorentz Transformation & Special Relativity

Click For Summary
Special relativity is a comprehensive physical theory that encompasses the principles of the speed of light and inertial reference frames. The Lorentz transformation serves as a mathematical tool within this theory, allowing for the conversion of measurements between different inertial reference frames. While special relativity provides the theoretical framework, the Lorentz transform facilitates practical calculations related to that framework. The relationship between the two is akin to the connection between geometry and cartography, where one relies on the other for practical application. Understanding both concepts is essential for comprehending the physics of Minkowski spacetime.
BadgerBadger92
Messages
168
Reaction score
87
TL;DR
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v

What exactly is the difference between special relativity and the Lorentz transformation? Reading about them they seem to be really similar.
Sorry for the extra question. Just have a lot of questions lately and I know some people around here are annoyed with that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Special relativity is a physical theory. The Lorentz transform is a mathematical operation. Special relativity uses the Lorentz transform to make predictions about physical experiments.
 
  • Like
Likes Wes Tausend, vanhees71, malawi_glenn and 2 others
Special relativity is a set of postulates regarding speed of light and inertial reference frames which forms an entire theory.

The Lorentz-transformation is a mathematical operation used to find the quantities measured in one inertial reference frame expressed as quantities measured in another inertial reference frame.

It's like asking what the difference between feynman diagrams and quantum field theory is.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and topsquark
The Lorentz transforms are one way of defining Minkowski spacetime. Special Relativity is the physics of being in a Minkowski spacetime. Naturally, the Lorentz transforms turn up a lot.

It's a bit like the difference between Euclidean (and spherical) geometry and cartography. You can't do much cartography without an understanding of straight lines and angles, but cartography isn't just straight lines and angles.
 
Hello, everyone, hope someone will resolve my doubts. I have posted here some two years ago asking for an explanation of the Lorentz transforms derivation found in the Einstein 1905 paper. The answer I got seemed quite satisfactory. Two years after I revisit this derivation and this is what I see. In the Einstein original paper, the Lorentz transforms derivation included as a premise that light is always propagated along the direction perpendicular to the line of motion when viewed from the...