High School Difference between note, tone and mode

Click For Summary
The terms note, tone, and mode are primarily associated with music rather than physics. In a physics context, a "tone" refers to a pure frequency, while a "note" is a complex sound made up of a fundamental frequency and its overtones, influencing timbre. A "mode" in music relates to a scale of notes, whereas in physics, it denotes a specific pattern of vibration or oscillation. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the relationship between musical terminology and physical concepts. The conversation highlights the importance of context when discussing terms across different fields.
donaldparida
Messages
146
Reaction score
10
In physics, wave mechanics and vibration specifically, do the terms note, tone and mode mean the same thing or do they refer to difference things? Also what does the mode of oscillation exactly mean?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
donaldparida said:
In physics, wave mechanics and vibration specifically, do the terms note, tone and mode mean the same thing or do they refer to difference things?
I don't think those are physics terms, they are music terms. Physics terms are frequency, amplitude, wavelength, etc.
 
Last edited:
I am asking the difference between them from a physics perspective.
 
They are still music terms.
 
IIRC a "tone" in music is a pure frequency in physics. A "note" produced by a musical instrument, e.g. by plucking a string, is a complex superposition of pure tones: the fundamental and its various overtones. Their relative amplitudes determine the "timbre" of the sound which distinguishes the various instruments. A "mode" in music is a type of "scale" (sequence of allowable notes). This is different from a "mode" in physics, which usually means a "mode of vibration" or "mode of oscillation", i.e. a particular standing-wave pattern on a string, drumhead, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes Phil Freihofner, CWatters and donaldparida
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K