Difference between product and pullback

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between the categorical product of two objects and the pullback of two morphisms sharing the same domains. It emphasizes that while both concepts can yield similar diagrams, the pullback is influenced by the morphisms involved, which can lead to different outcomes in various categories. For instance, in the category of abelian groups, the nature of the morphisms (trivial or injective) significantly affects the pullback's structure. The product of two objects can be viewed as a specific case of a pullback in a slice category. Ultimately, understanding these differences is crucial for accurately applying category theory concepts.
espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
What exactly is the difference between the categorical product of two objects and the fiber product (pullback) of two morphisms with the same two objects as domains? However I look at it, the morphisms in the definition appear superfluous.

Can anyone display a category where products and pullbacks generally are not equal?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of the product of two morphisms?
 
I guess a reasonable definition is to do it in a slice category.
When I work it out, I get the same diagram as with a pullback, but with two extra morphisms, but these are superfluous due to commutativity, so the pullback is the product of two objects in a slice category, or of two mophisms with a shared codomain.

From wiki:
225px-Categorical_pullback_%28expanded%29.svg.png


But it seems that this forces the domain of the pullback to be the product of X and Y with p1 and p2 beign the usual projection morphisms. Is this not the case?

Edit: I was mistaken. Of course, the pullback depends on the morphisms. For example in the category of abelian groups, if the two morphisms are trivial, the pullback is the trivial group, but if they are injective, the pullback is the regular product of the domains, correct?
 
Last edited:
espen180 said:
Edit: I was mistaken. Of course, the pullback depends on the morphisms. For example in the category of abelian groups, if the two morphisms are trivial, the pullback is the trivial group, but if they are injective, the pullback is the regular product of the domains, correct?
No. If the morphisms are trivial (i.e. send everything to the identity) then the pullback is the regular direct product of the domains. If they are injective the pullback varies, depending on what the morphisms are. For example consider the pullback along id:G->G and id:G->G. As a set, it's ##\{(g_1,g_2) \colon g_1=g_2\}##, i.e., it's the diagonal in ##G\times G##.
 
The pullback of f: X → Z and g: Y → Z is their product in the slice category of objects over Z.

The product of X and Y is the pullback of X → 1 and Y → 1, where 1 is the terminal object.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
862