Difference between static and magnetic attraction

lennybogzy
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
What is the physical difference between static and magnetic attraction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most simply the forces are described by the charges and domains respectively. Static attraction (re: Coulumb's law) depends on the type of charges (being opposite or similar) and the quantity of charge. Magnetic attraction, however, depends on the "spin" of the particles and the quantity and how well aligned those "spins" are. Note the quotation marks as the particles are merely described as "spinning" but really exist in a quantum state that we label as a spin.

That being said, the two are very similar and fundamentally linked (re: Lorentz Force). In quantum mechanics, it often makes more sense to use the electromagnetic tensor, which combines the aspects of both electric and magnetic forces.
 

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?'

Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
View full post »

Similar threads

I The classical concept of work in a QCD context?
Replies
2
Views
954
I Trying to understand why electrons fill orbitals the way they do
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Textbook proof of repulsion/attraction of equal charges according to odd/even spin
Replies
7
Views
1K
B Electrons in a nonmoving conductor and non-varying magnetic field
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Magnetic attraction force Question
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Effect of Homog./Non-Homog. Magnetic Field in Heisenberg Spin System
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Can a static EM field consist of photons?
Replies
14
Views
2K
B Is the weak nuclear force attractive or repulsive or both?
Replies
18
Views
4K
Why do compasses always point in the wrong direction?
Replies
6
Views
909
I The difference between calculating energy from 1 vs. 2 magnets?
Replies
3
Views
877

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top