Difference in Powers of Odd Primes

  • Thread starter Thread starter omalleyt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Primes
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the equation p^x - d^y = p - d, where p and d are odd primes and x, y are natural numbers greater than one. The original poster seeks to prove whether this equation holds under these conditions, noting a specific interest in odd primes. They provide an example with 3 and 2 but express difficulty in finding other examples that satisfy the equation with odd primes. A participant points out that if p equals d, the equation simplifies to zero, indicating that the original proposition may not be valid. The conversation highlights the challenge of proving the impossibility of the equation for odd primes.
omalleyt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm curious, can anyone think of a way to prove whether or not p^x - d^y = p - d, for any odd primes p,d and natural numbers x,y where x,y are not equal to one? This would be useful for a proof I am trying to work on.

So far, I have found that 3^2 - 2^3 = 3 - 2, but for this proof I am interested only in situations where p and d are both odd primes. I haven't found any examples that satisfy the equation with odd primes, but I haven't found a way to prove this equation impossible under these conditions. Ideally I would like to prove this impossible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
omalleyt said:
... can anyone think of a way to prove whether
or not p^x - d^y = p - d, for > >any odd primes p,d < <and natural numbers x,y
where x,y are not equal to one?

omalleyt,

can you give more restrictive parameters?

As it is, if p = d = an odd prime, and x, y > 1, and x = y, then

p^x - d^y =

p^x - p^x =

0 =

p - d =

p - p =

0
 
13^3-3^7=2197-2187=10=13-3.
 
Thanks, that saved me a lot of time trying to prove something that isn't true
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
607
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K