Difference in strength between extrusions and sheet metal

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the differences in stiffness between parts fabricated from sheet metal and those made from extrusions, particularly in the context of designing components like L-brackets. Participants explore how to factor these differences into stress and strain calculations, considering the implications of fabrication processes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the "common knowledge" that extrusions are inherently stiffer than sheet metal when dimensions are identical, suggesting that differences in fabrication processes, such as fillets at bends, may influence stiffness.
  • Another participant acknowledges that while identical cross sections should theoretically have the same stiffness, the fabrication process (bending vs. extrusion) might introduce variations that affect material properties.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of concrete theoretical backing for the perceived differences in stiffness, with a call for studies or papers that address this issue.
  • Participants discuss the role of work hardening during the fabrication processes and how it may impact the mechanical properties of the materials used.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of knowing the specific material being used, as properties can vary significantly between materials like aluminum and steel.
  • There is mention of tolerances associated with fabrication processes that could affect the nominal dimensions and material properties, suggesting that designers should consider these variations in their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether extrusions are definitively stiffer than sheet metal, with some asserting that fabrication processes play a significant role in determining stiffness. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the impact of these factors.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is limited by the lack of specific studies or theoretical frameworks addressing the differences in stiffness due to fabrication processes. There are also unresolved questions regarding the specific materials being discussed and their properties.

ENgez
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello,

How do I take into account the difference in stiffness when fabricating a part (for example, an L-bracket) from sheet metal or using an extrusion?

In particular, where I work, it is "common knowledge" that extrusions are stiffer. How do i factor this in the stress and strain calculations?

I thought of using the theory of curved beams for sheet metal parts, and using two perpendicularly connected straight beams for the extrusion.

Does anyone have a standard procedure for this?

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is it "common knowledge" that extrusions are stiffer when all of the dimensions of each are exactly the same?

I would imagine that in most cases, the extrusion has a bit of a filet at the vertex of the bend that is not found on the bent sheet metal. This could make a lot of difference for some loading types.

If the two cross sections are exactly the same in every detail, then I cannot see any reason for a difference in stiffness.
 
Yes, it is common knowledge among some of the more experienced engineers, although there is no concrete theory to back it up. I am just fact checking.

I understand that identical cross sections should have the same stiffness, but allegedly, the fabrication process itself (bending or extrusion) makes some sort of difference.

So far, I have not managed to find a study or paper which deals with this.
 
ENgez said:
I understand that identical cross sections should have the same stiffness, but allegedly, the fabrication process itself (bending or extrusion) makes some sort of difference.
Yes, the fabrication process can have a large effect on the properties. Introductory textbooks on materials science and/or manufacturing processes are a good start.
Any of these may be relevant;
work hardening can occur during plastic deformation (ie folding operations)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_hardening

But it can also occur during extrusion (and rolling of sheet for that matter) so it depends on the details of the process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrusion

Many extrusions undergo subsequent heat treatments to alter their properties:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_treating

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardenability
 
ENgez said:
Yes, it is common knowledge among some of the more experienced engineers, although there is no concrete theory to back it up. I am just fact checking.

I understand that identical cross sections should have the same stiffness, but allegedly, the fabrication process itself (bending or extrusion) makes some sort of difference.

So far, I have not managed to find a study or paper which deals with this.
It would help if we knew what material you are dealing with here. Is it aluminum, steel, what?

From a design standpoint, the properties presented for various sections (area, moment of inertia, etc.) are based on nominal dimensions. For rolled or extruded shapes, there will likely be some tolerances associated with the fabrication process (rolling or extrusion), just like extrusion or rolling may "work-harden" the material.

Because it is difficult to pin down these differences in dimensions and material properties from their nominal values, designers use the standard strength values for the grade of material and the nominal dimensions of the section.

If your design doesn't work unless you take into account these variations, then perhaps you need to re-evaluate the design from the ground up. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K