What is the Expression for the Difference of Two Square Numbers?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chhitiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Square
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expression for the difference of two square numbers can be represented as (r+s)(r-s). In the context of self-conjugating Ferrer's graphs, it has been established that all positive integers except for 2 can be represented in this form. The discussion also explores the relationship between the difference of two squares and triangular numbers, specifically through the expression ∀n>m ∃t:t(t+1)/2=n²-m². The first few pairs (n, m) where this expression fails include (3, 1), (5, 1), (3, 2), (4, 2), (4, 3), (5, 3), and (5, 4).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic expressions, specifically the difference of squares
  • Familiarity with triangular numbers and their properties
  • Knowledge of self-conjugating Ferrer's graphs
  • Basic concepts of mathematical logic and quantifiers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of self-conjugating Ferrer's graphs
  • Explore the relationship between triangular numbers and square numbers
  • Study the implications of the expression ∀n>m ∃t:t(t+1)/2=n²-m²
  • Investigate the conditions under which the difference of two squares can be triangular
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students interested in number theory, particularly those exploring the relationships between square numbers, triangular numbers, and Ferrer's graphs.

chhitiz
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
is there an expression for the difference of two square no.s, except, of course for rsquare minus ssquare
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(r+s)(r-s)
 
god you are funny. i posted this question because i was trying to find out all possible no.s which have a self-conjugating ferrer's graph, and needed to see if diff. of two square no.s is in anyway in form of a triangle no. or not. anyways, i have inferred that all no.s except for 2 can be jotted as a self-conjugating ferrer's graph. am i correct?
 
Your first post was entirely unclear, and I'm not quite sure what your second means. "if diff. of two square no.s is in anyway in form of a triangle no. or not"? Does that mean something like "Is the difference of two squares triangular?"?

If that interpretation is generally correct, I can think of at least four ways to take it:
\forall n>m \exists t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
\forall n \exists m,t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
\forall N \exists n>m>N,t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
\exists n,m,t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2

If it's not, then you'll have to be more clear.
 
that was exactly what i meant, so thanks
 
Which?
 
the first one. by the way, am i not correct in saying that all +ve integers except 2 can be expressed as a self conjugating ferrer's graph?
 
chhitiz said:
the first one.

CRGreathouse said:
\forall n>m \exists t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2

The first few (n, m) for which this fails are:
(3, 1)
(5, 1)
(3, 2)
(4, 2)
(4, 3)
(5, 3)
(5, 4)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K