Different EMFs joined in parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanishq Nandan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the currents I1, I2, and I3 through three parallel branches with different EMFs. Participants emphasize the importance of using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and nodal analysis to establish relationships between the voltages and currents in the circuit. Millman's theorem is suggested as a useful method for simplifying the analysis. A participant successfully calculates the node voltage, finding it to be approximately 7.3 V, which leads to correct current values. The conversation highlights the challenges of working with differing EMFs in parallel and the need for careful application of circuit analysis techniques.
Tanishq Nandan
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



We need to find I1,I2,I3 (current through all the three branches)
20170617_113748-1.jpg

Homework Equations


I know that if emfs *of same value* are connected in parallel,then they can be replaced with a single emf of that same value,and that's where the problem comes in.There are 3 emfs,all of different values connected in parallel.
As far as the rest of the curcuit goes,
▪KVL (Kirchoffs Voltage Law):Sum of potential drops across a closed loop is zero
▪V=I.R
▪Voltage difference across conducting wire=0

The Attempt at a Solution


20170617_115300-1.jpg

You'll forgive me if the diagram's a little crowded.Basically,I assumed potential to be 0 at a point for reference purposes, and then labelled all other parts of the circuit corresponding to that.

Now,as I said in the last line of the previous section,

▪Voltage difference across conducting wire=0
That means that V(at A)=V(at B)=V(at C)
(Assumin I1 as x,I2 as y,I3 as z)
That would give us our first set of equations:
8-x=9-2y=10-3z

Now,applying KVL in loop ABEF,
8-(8-x)+(9-2y)-9=0
However,on solving these equations,I ain't getting the right answer.

Help appreciated..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use nodal analysis. Write the KCL equation for the left node (junction of three resistors) in terms of the node voltage. Assume the negative terminal node of the batteries at 0V. The only unknown in the equation will be the node voltage.
Tanishq Nandan said:
I know that if emfs *of same value* are connected in parallel,then they can be replaced with a single emf of that same value,and that's where the problem comes in.
Try Millman's theorem.
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...ghLMAQ&usg=AFQjCNG4avVDzT7lW-BIJoffcDhKHjqD5Q.
 
  • Like
Likes Tanishq Nandan
It is easier for me to work out the problem than to see you you where you went wrong. Also it would be easier for me to see whether I went wrong if you had given the answer which apparently you know.

Yes, essentially as cnh says, you seem to realize that the voltage, we'll call it V, at A, B and C has to be the same despite the differing battery EMFs. From that I would work out the currents I1, I2, I3 in terms of V: their sum equals the current through the 6 Ω resistor, which gives you an equation with only V as unknown . I get for V, 95/13 ≈ 7.3 V is that what it's supposed to be?
 
epenguin said:
I get for V, 95/13 ≈ 7.3 V
95/12,and yes,it's giving the corect answer for I1,I2 and I3.
Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes epenguin
Thanks for the link to this theorem.It's awesome,but the answer coming from it is SLIGHTLY different (95/11 whereas it should be 95/12).
Is this expected or did I do something wrong?
But,still,thanks!
cnh1995 said:
You can use nodal analysis. Write the KCL equation for the left node (junction of three resistors) in terms of the node voltage. Assume the negative terminal node of the batteries at 0V. The only unknown in the equation will be the node voltage.

Try Millman's theorem.
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...ghLMAQ&usg=AFQjCNG4avVDzT7lW-BIJoffcDhKHjqD5Q.
 
Tanishq Nandan said:
95/12,and yes,it's giving the corect answer for I1,I2 and I3.
Thanks.

Yes /12 not /13, I can't add up. :redface:

But was important to realize it was in the right ballpark - there is a lot of conductance than those three parallel branches.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K