Different EMFs joined in parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanishq Nandan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit problem involving three different EMFs connected in parallel, where the goal is to determine the currents (I1, I2, I3) through each branch. The context includes applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and understanding the implications of having different EMFs in parallel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using KVL and nodal analysis to approach the problem. There are attempts to set up equations based on voltage equality at different points in the circuit. Some participants question the correctness of their calculations and the assumptions made regarding the voltage across the branches.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on using nodal analysis and Millman's theorem. There is an ongoing exploration of the voltage at the nodes and how it relates to the currents in the branches. Some participants express uncertainty about their results and seek clarification on discrepancies in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of assumptions regarding the reference point for voltage and the potential differences across the conducting wires. Participants also note variations in results obtained from different approaches, indicating a need for further examination of the methods used.

Tanishq Nandan
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



We need to find I1,I2,I3 (current through all the three branches)
20170617_113748-1.jpg

Homework Equations


I know that if emfs *of same value* are connected in parallel,then they can be replaced with a single emf of that same value,and that's where the problem comes in.There are 3 emfs,all of different values connected in parallel.
As far as the rest of the curcuit goes,
▪KVL (Kirchoffs Voltage Law):Sum of potential drops across a closed loop is zero
▪V=I.R
▪Voltage difference across conducting wire=0

The Attempt at a Solution


20170617_115300-1.jpg

You'll forgive me if the diagram's a little crowded.Basically,I assumed potential to be 0 at a point for reference purposes, and then labelled all other parts of the circuit corresponding to that.

Now,as I said in the last line of the previous section,

▪Voltage difference across conducting wire=0
That means that V(at A)=V(at B)=V(at C)
(Assumin I1 as x,I2 as y,I3 as z)
That would give us our first set of equations:
8-x=9-2y=10-3z

Now,applying KVL in loop ABEF,
8-(8-x)+(9-2y)-9=0
However,on solving these equations,I ain't getting the right answer.

Help appreciated..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use nodal analysis. Write the KCL equation for the left node (junction of three resistors) in terms of the node voltage. Assume the negative terminal node of the batteries at 0V. The only unknown in the equation will be the node voltage.
Tanishq Nandan said:
I know that if emfs *of same value* are connected in parallel,then they can be replaced with a single emf of that same value,and that's where the problem comes in.
Try Millman's theorem.
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...ghLMAQ&usg=AFQjCNG4avVDzT7lW-BIJoffcDhKHjqD5Q.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanishq Nandan
It is easier for me to work out the problem than to see you you where you went wrong. Also it would be easier for me to see whether I went wrong if you had given the answer which apparently you know.

Yes, essentially as cnh says, you seem to realize that the voltage, we'll call it V, at A, B and C has to be the same despite the differing battery EMFs. From that I would work out the currents I1, I2, I3 in terms of V: their sum equals the current through the 6 Ω resistor, which gives you an equation with only V as unknown . I get for V, 95/13 ≈ 7.3 V is that what it's supposed to be?
 
epenguin said:
I get for V, 95/13 ≈ 7.3 V
95/12,and yes,it's giving the corect answer for I1,I2 and I3.
Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: epenguin
Thanks for the link to this theorem.It's awesome,but the answer coming from it is SLIGHTLY different (95/11 whereas it should be 95/12).
Is this expected or did I do something wrong?
But,still,thanks!
cnh1995 said:
You can use nodal analysis. Write the KCL equation for the left node (junction of three resistors) in terms of the node voltage. Assume the negative terminal node of the batteries at 0V. The only unknown in the equation will be the node voltage.

Try Millman's theorem.
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...ghLMAQ&usg=AFQjCNG4avVDzT7lW-BIJoffcDhKHjqD5Q.
 
Tanishq Nandan said:
95/12,and yes,it's giving the corect answer for I1,I2 and I3.
Thanks.

Yes /12 not /13, I can't add up. :redface:

But was important to realize it was in the right ballpark - there is a lot of conductance than those three parallel branches.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K