Differential Amplifier Common Mode Thevenin Equivalent

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the small signal analysis of a MOSFET differential amplifier, specifically regarding its common-mode equivalent circuit. The initial confusion arises from the characterization of a Norton equivalent circuit, which the author believes does not align with the typical definition involving a parallel resistance and current source. The second figure presents a Thevenin equivalent resistance as just RL, leading to a calculation that initially appears incorrect. Upon further analysis, the author realizes that neglecting to turn off the common-mode input voltage (vc) affects the dependent current source, which should not be the case for a proper Thevenin equivalent. This insight clarifies the situation, highlighting the importance of correctly shutting down vc to obtain the accurate Thevenin equivalent resistance.
anvoice
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
A sanity check on a text I am using to learn EE. Cannot replicate the result for the common mode Thevenin resistance in a figure in the text.
I am currently reading about small signal analysis of a MOSFET differential amplifier. The text I am using has the below two figures for a common-mode equivalent circuit for the amplifier. The first makes sense to me except where it calls it a "Norton equivalent circuit", whereas I thought a Norton between either the vx or vy terminals would need to have a single resistance in parallel with a current source, and I don't see how this qualifies.
More importantly, the second figure has the Thevenin equivalent resistance as just RL. Seeing that exciting the subcircuits on the leftmost figure with a voltage and measuring the current seems to be a reasonable way of finding Rth in this case, I did that and ended up with a Rth of
2RL / (2 + (RL) x (vc)). Am I missing something major or is this a typo in the text? Granted it doesn't invalidate the main result (vx - vy = 0), it bothers me.

DiffAmp.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think I figured it out. Looking at just this subcircuit, I forgot to shut down the signal vc (common-mode input) to the MOSFETs. If vc is off, naturally the dependent current source becomes an open circuit and the resistance is indeed RL. It is also a warning sign in this case that if you forget to shut down vc, the Thevenin equivalent resistance is actually dependent on the excitation voltage, which shouldn't be the case. The hints were there, but just managed to piece them together.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top