Differential Calculus: Solving for Optimization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the cost of a tin can using differential calculus, specifically for a can with a fixed volume of 850ml. The cost function is defined as C(r) = 0.01(2πr² + h(2πr)) + 0.015(4πr + h). After differentiation, the minimum cost is found to be 5.797 cents for a radius of 4.95 cm. The challenge presented is to derive a function that expresses the minimum cost for any volume, requiring the relationship between volume, height, and radius to be established in a way that allows for graphing cost against volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential calculus, specifically differentiation techniques.
  • Familiarity with cost functions and optimization problems.
  • Knowledge of geometric properties of cylinders, including surface area and volume calculations.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations involving multiple variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive cost functions for geometric shapes, focusing on cylindrical objects.
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers for optimization under constraints.
  • Explore graphing techniques for functions of two variables, particularly in relation to cost and volume.
  • Investigate the relationship between surface area and volume to optimize dimensions for minimal cost.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focused on optimization problems, as well as engineers and designers working with cylindrical containers seeking to minimize material costs.

toasticles
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1. Hey all, For my calculus class we were giving the problem of solving for the optimization of a tin can using differential calculus. The problem was to find the minimum cost for any tin can of any height(as well as using the equation for the tin we had). The surface area of the cylinder was considered to be 0.01cents/cm2 and the seams where only height was counted and the circumferences at the top and bottom of the can where 0.015cents/cm2.

2. So the cost function for the can i chose was C(r)=0.01(surface area)+0.015(Seams) which then amounts to C(r)=0.01((2Pir^2)+h(2Pir)+0.015(4Pir+h).

This is completely correct and what everyone got for the basic cost function. Now we differentiated this and let C=0 so we could find the minimum cost (using an 850ml volume can we see that:) if Volume=2pir^2*h then we are able to differentiate by substituting v with 850 and getting height in terms of radius hence one variable so:(expanded and simplified):
C'(r)=0.04Pir-(17r^-2)+0.06Pi-25.5Pir^-3
So we all found the minimum for a radius of 4.95 which is 5.797cents.

However the second part and insanely difficult to think about and figure out part was given to us moments later:

The challenge was to find an equation or function that shows the minimum cost FOR ALL volumes of any can So basically v=minimum cost of v

So on the x-axis one would have the volume and the y-axis one would have the minimum cost for that height.

None of us could get only 2 variables in the equation (v and r), where from the volume function you will always have volume substitued in and it just would'nt work

i hope this made sense and would reallllly like some help

3. Attempt at the optimized function for any can of any height finding the minimum cost:
minimum cost = (differential of cost = 0)
C'(r) = (dc/dr = 0)

here i realized i was going in the wrong direction cause h is no where in the function and I'm completely stuck none of the other maths B and C students can figure this out please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick is, that now the volume can be anything, but it is still fixed.
At least, I suppose that the question they want you to answer is:
* For a can of fixed volume v, what are the optimal height and radius?

In that case, you can consider v as a constant, and express your answers in it, for example:
* the optimal dimensions are h = 12v and r = 6/h = 1/(2v)
 
okay so i sort of see what you're saying there compu :)

however we need to find the minimum cost for any volume so yes the optimal height and radius that give the Highest surface area to volume ratio or the smallest values for h and r that give the Vi.e. (the smallest surface area that still gives the volume, v)

also why would v be fixed if it considered a variable if you graph it?

so if the minimum cost is meant to be found for any volume that means that cost and volume will both be dependent on height and radius so how do i write this as a function that will give me the graph where x-axis is the volume of a can and y-axis gives the corresponding optimal cost which is given by optimal height and radius?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K