Differential Difficulties in an RL Circuit Problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
Geromy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An inductor with L = 50 mH is in series with a resistor of R = 180 ohms. At t = 0, a potential difference of 45 V is suddenly applied across the series circuit. At what rate is the current increasing after 1.2 milliseconds?



Homework Equations



V = IR + Emf
Emf = -L(dI/dt)
I = dQ/dt


The Attempt at a Solution



My first instinct was to try and find the maximum current, or when the rate of change of the current is 0, but I'm not sure that doing that would accomplish anything. I've been puzzling over how to relate the concepts with differential equations, but I've gotten pretty stuck there, too. Any points in the right direction would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay! But I'm kind of lost there, too - what information do I need to construct the differential equation?
 
Geromy said:
Okay! But I'm kind of lost there, too - what information do I need to construct the differential equation?

KCL would be a good start.
 
I don't know anything about KCL...

After doing a little research, though, it looks like maybe Q(t) = L*V(1-e^(tR/L)): if this is true, then it's just a matter of derivatives. I'm not sure it's right, though (I cobbled it together from Wikipedia and Hyperphysics) - would knowing the KCL help?

(the formula comes from a similar one which I learned for RC circuits, in which Q(t) = C*V(1-e^(t/RC)), so I'm not so sure that it's as simple as switching the time constant)
 
Geromy said:
I don't know anything about KCL...

After doing a little research, though, it looks like maybe Q(t) = L*V(1-e^(tR/L)): if this is true, then it's just a matter of derivatives. I'm not sure it's right, though (I cobbled it together from Wikipedia and Hyperphysics) - would knowing the KCL help?

(the formula comes from a similar one which I learned for RC circuits, in which Q(t) = C*V(1-e^(t/RC)), so I'm not so sure that it's as simple as switching the time constant)

I don't remember the solutions, its quite easy to find them. I meant Kirchoff's laws, you should have heard of them.
 
Ah! Yes, okay - I think that's already been essentially completed. The circuit is a single loop in series, so V = IR + Emf, like I put above.
 
Geromy said:
Ah! Yes, okay - I think that's already been essentially completed. The circuit is a single loop in series, so V = IR + Emf, like I put above.

Yes. :)

So what is the D.E (differential equation) you get?
 
V = R(dQ/dt) - L(dI/dt)

The problem is I don't know the equation describing Q - I've found a candidate, but I'm not terribly confident about it.
 
Geromy said:
V = R(dQ/dt) - L(dI/dt)

The problem is I don't know the equation describing Q - I've found a candidate, but I'm not terribly confident about it.

Why minus? :confused:
 
The back Emf opposes the direction of current flow, so it's negative until the current starts switching directions, is my understanding
 
Geromy said:
The back Emf opposes the direction of current flow, so it's negative until the current starts switching directions, is my understanding

Well, I am not sure how to explain it as I am a student myself, not an expert. :)

Yes, the back emf opposes the direction of current flow. As you state, it's negative which would mean,

V-L(dI/dt)=IR

Agreed?
 
Last edited:
Geromy said:
V = R(dQ/dt) - L(dI/dt)

The problem is I don't know the equation describing Q - I've found a candidate, but I'm not terribly confident about it.
What is Q supposed to represent in the circuit? The charge of what? The answer is there is no element in the circuit with a charge Q, so it doesn't make sense to express any quantity in terms of this ill-defined variable.

The current I is apparently the current through the inductor. How is that related to the current through the resistor?
 
Geromy said:
The back Emf opposes the direction of current flow, so it's negative until the current starts switching directions, is my understanding
From a problem-solving standpoint, you should follow this convention: Assume a direction of current flow for each element (R, L, and C). Label the end where the current enters with a + and the end where the current leaves with a -. As you traverse a loop, if you go from + to - across an element, you subtract the potential difference. If you go from - to +, you add the potential difference. With this sign convention, you have the relations
\begin{align*}
v &= iR \\
i &= C\frac{dv}{dt} \\
v &= L\frac{di}{dt}
\end{align*} where v is the potential difference across the element and i is the current flowing through the element.

(Batteries follow the opposite sign convention because they are sources. The current flows out through the + side.)