Differential Equation for Projectile Motion with Air Drag

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a differential equation for projectile motion in a 2D plane, specifically considering the effects of air resistance. Participants explore various aspects of modeling the motion, including the forces acting on the projectile and the application of numerical methods like Euler's method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a model including initial force, angle, mass, and air resistance, but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their equations.
  • Another participant argues that the initial force is irrelevant, stating that the analysis should focus on initial velocity and the forces of gravity and air resistance.
  • Concerns are raised about the inclusion of gravity in both force equations, with a suggestion that it should only appear in the vertical force equation.
  • Participants discuss the proper decomposition of air resistance, suggesting it should depend on the total velocity vector rather than just the components.
  • There is a mention of the equations of motion (EoM) involving gravitational acceleration and a drag coefficient, indicating a more complex relationship than initially presented.
  • Questions arise regarding the necessity of calculating velocity updates in the Euler method, with some participants seeking clarification on vector decomposition and its relevance to the problem.
  • One participant emphasizes that air resistance should always act in the direction opposite to the velocity vector, challenging the proposed simplifications of the drag force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the relevance of initial forces, the correct formulation of air resistance, and the proper application of numerical methods. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached on the correct approach to modeling the projectile motion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the projectile, particularly concerning the role of gravity and the nature of air resistance. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding regarding vector decomposition and its implications for the equations of motion.

ChanYoung Park
Hi! I was wondering how I could come up with a differential equation for projectile motion on a 2D plane when air resistance is not negligible. I'm trying to guess the position of a projected ball at a certain time period by approximating the coordinates using the Euler's method.
Here, I would assume that I know the angle, mass, and initial force; θ, m and F are constants. What I modeled so far are the equations below, but I'm pretty sure that they're completely wrong. And I do not know how I could decompose x(t) and y(t) in terms of the time.$$F_x= Fcosθ - mg - kv_{x}^2$$
$$F_y= Fsinθ - mg - kv_{y}^2$$
$$\frac{dx}{dt} = v_x$$
$$\frac{dy}{dt} = v_y$$
$$\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^2} = a_x$$
$$\frac{d^{2}y}{dt^2} = a_y$$Please help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kninfinite
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the initial force is relevant here. This kind of problems starts after the projectile has an initial velocity, and the only forces present will be gravity and air resistance. Only the initial velocity (and position) matter. I have no idea at all what you mean with decomposing x(t) and y(t) in terms of the time.
With eulers method you start out with a position x(t), y(t) and velocity vx(t), vy(t), and you compute:

x(t+dt) = x(t) + dt * v(t)
y(t+dt) = x(t) + dt * v(t)
vx(t+dt) = vx(t) + ax
vy(t+dt) = vy(t) + ay
with the timestep dt something like 0.01s. repeat as often as needed.
To find a, you have to use the forces in x and y direction.
 
I think there are several things wrong here. First, gravity only acts downward, so it should not be present in both equations. Assuming the y-axis is up-down, then the mg term should only be in the Fy equation. Second, the air resistance depends on the square of the total velocity, and acts in the direction of the current velocity, so it should be decomposed as follows:
<br /> F_x = k (v_x^2 + v_y^2)\frac{v_x}{|v|} = k (v_x^2 + v_y^2)\frac{v_x}{\sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2}} = k v_x\sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2}

and similarly for Fy. This is the same as what you wrote if vx or vy is zero, but otherwise not.
 
willem2 said:
I don't think the initial force is relevant here. This kind of problems starts after the projectile has an initial velocity, and the only forces present will be gravity and air resistance. Only the initial velocity (and position) matter. I have no idea at all what you mean with decomposing x(t) and y(t) in terms of the time.
With eulers method you start out with a position x(t), y(t) and velocity vx(t), vy(t), and you compute:

x(t+dt) = x(t) + dt * v(t)
y(t+dt) = x(t) + dt * v(t)
vx(t+dt) = vx(t) + ax
vy(t+dt) = vy(t) + ay
with the timestep dt something like 0.01s. repeat as often as needed.
To find a, you have to use the forces in x and y direction.

Thanks for your reply! So the way I can get the x coordinate of the ball at t given the intial velocity vx is
#1. to find the velocity at time t+dt using:
$$v_{x}(t+dt)=v_{x}(t)+a_{x}\cdot{dt}$$
#2. then to get the x coordinate at time t by using:
$$x(t+dt)=x(t)+v_{x}(t)\cdot{dt}$$
and to find ax, I would need to use force equation which is...
$$F_{x}=ma_{x}=kv_{x}\sqrt{v_{x}^{2}+v_{y}^{2}}$$

...but as I think... is #1 necessary??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
phyzguy said:
I think there are several things wrong here. First, gravity only acts downward, so it should not be present in both equations. Assuming the y-axis is up-down, then the mg term should only be in the Fy equation. Second, the air resistance depends on the square of the total velocity, and acts in the direction of the current velocity, so it should be decomposed as follows:
<br /> F_x = k (v_x^2 + v_y^2)\frac{v_x}{|v|} = k (v_x^2 + v_y^2)\frac{v_x}{\sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2}} = k v_x\sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2}

and similarly for Fy. This is the same as what you wrote if vx or vy is zero, but otherwise not.
Thanks for corrections! But I don't quite get what's happening with vx and vy.
Could you please explain me how it's being done?
 
Do you know how to decompose a vector into its components? What is the length of the vector v in terms of vx and vy, and how much of v points along x and how much along y?
 
I'd also say the EoM is
$$m \ddot{\vec{x}}=-m \vec{g} - C \vec{v} |\vec{v}|,$$
where ##m## is the mass of the particle, ##\vec{g}## the (constant) gravitational acceleration close to the surface of the Earth, and ##C## a constant related to the ##C_w## drag coefficient by
$$C=\frac{1}{2} C_w \varrho A.$$
 
phyzguy said:
Do you know how to decompose a vector into its components? What is the length of the vector v in terms of vx and vy, and how much of v points along x and how much along y?
Though what is the reason for decomposing the vector? Can't it be just Fx=kvx2?
 
ChanYoung Park said:
Though what is the reason for decomposing the vector? Can't it be just Fx=kvx2?

The force due to air resistance is always in the (negative) direction of the velocity vector. Quoting from Wikipedia, "In fluid dynamics, drag (sometimes called air resistance, a type of friction, or fluid resistance, another type of friction or fluid friction) is a force acting opposite to the relative motion of any object moving with respect to a surrounding fluid." With your proposed equation, this is not the case, and the air resistance would cause the projectile to change direction, not just slow down. This can happen if the projectile has a non-spherical shape, but I doubt if this is the case you want to analyze. As vanhees71 said, another way to write the drag force which ensures that it is in the same direction as the velocity vector, is , F_D = -C \vec{v} |\vec{v}|
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K