Differential equations (application)

7 replies · 2K views · last reply
delsoo
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



hi, i have difficulties in this question... can you teach me how to get the ans please... i don't have the ans . this involved differential equations

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Attachments
  • Printed exam question 4 on rabbit population growth: rate proportional to population, doubling to 10,000 from 1985 to 1990, then disease causing deaths at 100 rabbits per month until 1992. Marked 9 marks.
    DSC_0129~2[1].jpg
    26 KB · Views: 465
  • Handwritten working on lined paper solving a rabbit population differential equation: dx/dt = kx, solved to ln x = kt + c, then applied with x0 = 1000 and y0 = 500 over 5 years and then 2 years, ending with y/1000 = e^(...).
    DSC_0129~3~2[1].jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 469
So... Quick note for the beginning step of the problem. You've defined x as the number of rabbits at a given time. But, remember, x is a function of t - x changes with time. You correctly set up the differential equation (i.e. dx(t)/dt=kx(t) ), but just stare at that real quick and see what it tells you. You have a function of t whose derivative with respect to t is just the same function multiplied by k. What function has the property that when you differentiate it, you get back the same thing, multiplied by a constant?
 
First you are told that the reproduction rate of the rabbits is proportional to the number of rabbits. Yes, that is the same as dx/dt= kx. You can use the fact that the number of rabbits doubled in 5 years (60 months) to determine k.

But then you are told that "an outbreak of a certain disease caused the death of 100 rabbits per month". I see that you have let "y" be the "number of deaths". Since that is constant at 100 per month, I wouldn't do that. Rather, I would say, as long as t is the time measured in months, dx/dt= kx- 100. And, since we are told, at the time this disease began the rabbits had "doubled to 10000", I would take t= 0 at the time the disease began and x(0)= 10000, not 5000.

Solve that equation for x(t). Then, since you are asked for the number of rabbits two years after the outbreak of the disease, and t is in months, find x(24).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
First you are told that the reproduction rate of the rabbits is proportional to the number of rabbits. Yes, that is the same as dx/dt= kx. You can use the fact that the number of rabbits doubled in 5 years (60 months) to determine k.

But then you are told that "an outbreak of a certain disease caused the death of 100 rabbits per month". I see that you have let "y" be the "number of deaths". Since that is constant at 100 per month, I wouldn't do that. Rather, I would say, as long as t is the time measured in months, dx/dt= kx- 100. And, since we are told, at the time this disease began the rabbits had "doubled to 10000", I would take t= 0 at the time the disease began and x(0)= 10000, not 5000.

Solve that equation for x(t). Then, since you are asked for the number of rabbits two years after the outbreak of the disease, and t is in months, find x(24).

do u mean this?
 
Attachments
  • Handwritten working on lined paper: dx/dt = kx - 100; dx/dt = (1/5) ln 2 (1000) - 100(24); dx/dt = -1013.70; 1000 - 1013.70 = 8986.3.
    DSC_0131[1].jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 441
HallsofIvy said:
First you are told that the reproduction rate of the rabbits is proportional to the number of rabbits. Yes, that is the same as dx/dt= kx. You can use the fact that the number of rabbits doubled in 5 years (60 months) to determine k.

But then you are told that "an outbreak of a certain disease caused the death of 100 rabbits per month". I see that you have let "y" be the "number of deaths". Since that is constant at 100 per month, I wouldn't do that. Rather, I would say, as long as t is the time measured in months, dx/dt= kx- 100. And, since we are told, at the time this disease began the rabbits had "doubled to 10000", I would take t= 0 at the time the disease began and x(0)= 10000, not 5000.

Solve that equation for x(t). Then, since you are asked for the number of rabbits two years after the outbreak of the disease, and t is in months, find x(24).

do u mean this? i have redo the question...
 
Attachments
  • Handwritten solution on lined paper: let number of rabbits = x, dx/dt = kx, solved by integration to ln x = kt + c, with initial conditions, then a 5-year doubling step giving k = (1/5) ln 2, and a 24-month calculation ending in 8968.3.
    DSC_0132~2[1].jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 447
No, I don't mean either of those. In the last you have the equation dx/dt= kx when I told you that you that the equation should be dx/dt= kx- 100 (with t measured in months). In the first, you start with the equation dx/dt= kx- 100 but then have "dx/dt= (1/5) ln 2(10000)- 100(24)". I don't know where you got that!

Do you know how to solve an equation of the form dx/dt= kx- 100?
 
sorry i may i know how to solve it please? i'd been thinking of this quite long . this is driving me crazy!