Differential Equations: Solving Non-separable Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving non-separable differential equations, specifically focusing on equations such as \(2(y+3)dx - xydy = 0\) and \(xy^3 + e^{x^2}dy = 0\). Participants explore various methods and substitutions to approach these problems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss attempts to separate variables in the first equation and express uncertainty about integrating the resulting expressions. There are questions about the validity of substitutions, particularly \(y = vx\), and how to apply them effectively. Some participants express confusion regarding the substitution method and its application.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the equations, with some participants providing guidance on substitutions and integration techniques. However, there is no explicit consensus on the best method, and several interpretations of the equations are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential errors in the problem statements, such as missing differentials, which may affect the discussion. Additionally, there is a mention of the challenges faced by novices in applying substitution methods effectively.

rpgkevin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve The following Equations:
2(y+3)dx-xydy=0

(x2-xy+y2)dx - xydy=0 use following assumption y=vx

xy3+ex2dy=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I am still a novice at diff eqs but here is what I got on the first one:
After seperating it I ended up with
(dx/x)=(ydy)/(2y+6) Then I get stuck with integrating the side with the Y

For the other two I believe they can not be separated and I am not sure what to do when this is the case
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the right side, you can rewrite it as

y/2(y+3) dy or ½(y+3-3)/(y+3), you can simply it even further i.e. polynomial division
 
For the y-integral on the first one, you can do this:[tex]\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{y}{y+3}\,dy = \frac{1}{2}\int \frac{(y+3)-3}{y+3}\,dy = \frac{1}{2}\int \left[1-\frac{3}{y+3}\right]\,dy[/tex]or you could use the substitution u=y+3.

On the second one, what did you get when you used the substitution y=vx?
 
vela said:
For the y-integral on the first one, you can do this:[tex]\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{y}{y+3}\,dy = \frac{1}{2}\int \frac{(y+3)-3}{y+3}\,dy = \frac{1}{2}\int \left[1-\frac{3}{y+3}\right]\,dy[/tex]or you could use the substitution u=y+3.

On the second one, what did you get when you used the substitution y=vx?

I have never used the substitution method I have no clue how to use that I looked it up earlier because someone told me that but I was unable to use the examples to work that one out
 
rpgkevin said:
xy3+ex2dy=0
I don't think you wrote this correctly - there seems to be a dx missing.
 
rpgkevin said:
I have never used the substitution method I have no clue how to use that I looked it up earlier because someone told me that but I was unable to use the examples to work that one out
If you differentiate y=vx with respect to x, you'll get
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = v + x\frac{dv}{dx}[/tex]
Multiplying through by dx, you end up with
[tex]dy = v \,dx + x\, dv[/tex]
Use this and the original substitution to eliminate y from the original equation. You should find it separates then, allowing you to solve for v, from which you can then find y.
 
Mark44 said:
I don't think you wrote this correctly - there seems to be a dx missing.

ahh you are correct it is suppose to be a dx after the xy3
 
vela said:
If you differentiate y=vx with respect to x, you'll get
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = v + x\frac{dv}{dx}[/tex]
Multiplying through by dx, you end up with
[tex]dy = v \,dx + x\, dv[/tex]
Use this and the original substitution to eliminate y from the original equation. You should find it separates then, allowing you to solve for v, from which you can then find y.

I tried what you said and plugged stuff back in and then I Tried separating things out and I can't seem to get it to separate out I am stuck at
X2(1-V-V2)dx=x2v2+(x3v)dv/dx)
 
Please show your work. It's impossible to see what went wrong without seeing what you actually did.
 
  • #10
For (2) you are told to let y= vx and from that dy= vdx+ xdv. Replace y and dy in the equation with those. It will reduce to a separable equation.
 
  • #11
rpgkevin said:
ahh you are correct it is suppose to be a dx after the xy3
In that case, it's pretty straightforward to see the equation separates. Why do you think it can't be separated?
 
  • #12
Also, when the variables are separated, the integration is not very difficult.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K