How to Calculate Charge Density Inside a Nucleus Using Gauss's Law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating charge density (ρ) inside an atomic nucleus using Gauss's Law. The electric field is defined as E = αr for r < a, where α is a constant and a is the nucleus radius. Two approaches are presented: the simple version of Gauss's Law yields ρ = (3Eε₀)/r for 0 < r ≤ a, while the differential form leads to ρ = ε₀E(1 + ln a). Participants highlight potential errors in applying the divergence and suggest using spherical coordinates instead of cylindrical ones for accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and charge density
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly divergence in spherical coordinates
  • Basic principles of atomic structure and nuclear physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different coordinate systems, focusing on spherical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of charge density in nuclear physics
  • Explore vector calculus techniques, specifically divergence and its physical interpretations
  • Investigate the relationship between electric fields and charge distributions in atomic models
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and nuclear physics, as well as researchers interested in atomic structure and charge distribution calculations.

Anti-Meson
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a model of an atomic nucleus, the electric field is given by:

E = α r for r < a

where α is a constant and a is the radius of the nucleus.


Use the differential form of Gauss's Law to calculate the charge density ρ inside the nucleus.


2. The attempt at a solution

Using the simple version of Gauss's law :

\int_{S} \underline{E}.\underline{dS} = \int_{V} \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} dV

Yields a result \rho = \frac{3E\epsilon_{0}}{r} for 0<r<=a

Homework Statement



However when using the differential form:

\nabla . \underline{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}

\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial (r E_{r})}{\partial r} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}

and when integrating with respect to r from 0 to a,

\rho = {\epsilon_{0}} E (1 + ln a )


Any helpful advice would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you accidently used the cylindrical version of the divergence.

Why are you integrating?
 
turin said:
I think you accidently used the cylindrical version of the divergence.

Why are you integrating?

I have used the cylindrical version, though this problem only depends on r so maybe use spherical? I integrated the partial differential with respect to r.

if I assume that Er is not a function of r but a constant then,

\frac{\partial (r E_{r})}{\partial r} = E_{r}

or if i use a radial divergence from the beginning:

\nabla . E = \frac{\partial (E)}{\partial r}

but by using that I get:

E = \frac{\rho r}{\epsilon_0}

i.e missing a factor of 3
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K