Differential Forms in GR: Higher Order Derivatives

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of differential forms in the context of General Relativity, particularly focusing on the existence and computation of higher-order derivatives of functions. Participants explore the implications of applying exterior derivatives multiple times and the nature of differential forms as they relate to tensors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether higher-order derivatives, such as \(\partial^2{f(x^1,...,x^n)}\), exist in the context of differential forms.
  • Another participant references a paper suggesting that higher-order forms are indeed used in General Relativity.
  • Some participants argue that there are no forms that represent the second derivative of a function, noting that applying the exterior derivative twice results in zero.
  • It is proposed that while \(d^2\) produces zero, a conceptual analogue can be formed by operating on a differential form with the Hodge dual, leading to expressions that are not necessarily zero.
  • A participant inquires about the components of differential forms, suggesting they might consist of derivatives of functions, while another counters that the components need not be derivatives but must be antisymmetric.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the existence and nature of higher-order derivatives in differential forms, with some asserting that such derivatives do not exist while others propose alternative interpretations. The discussion remains unresolved on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the definitions and assumptions about differential forms and their derivatives, as well as the implications of applying exterior derivatives multiple times.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
The differential form of a function is
[itex]\partial{f(x^1,...,x^n)}=\frac{\partial{f(x^1,...,x^n)}}{\partial{x^1}}dx^1+...+\frac{\partial{f(x^1,...,x^n)}}{\partial{x^n}}dx^n[/itex]Is there (especially in General Relativity) differential of higher orders, like [itex]\partial^2{f(x^1,...,x^n)}[/itex]? If so, how is it computed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
This paper discusses Differential forms, Tensors and uses in General Relativity so I would say yes higher order forms are used and are useful in General Relativity.

http://www.aei.mpg.de/~gielen/diffgeo.pdf
But at the same time no, there are no forms that are the second derivative of a function (as the OP suggests) as the exterior derivative applied twice gives zero (the any-dimensional equivalent of curl(grad(f))=0).

Of course there are other forms of higher order.
 
Orodruin said:
But at the same time no, there are no forms that are the second derivative of a function (as the OP suggests) as the exterior derivative applied twice gives zero (the any-dimensional equivalent of curl(grad(f))=0).

Of course there are other forms of higher order.

Yes, [itex]d^2[/itex] always produces zero. However, you can get something sort of conceptually similar to [itex]d^2[/itex]:
  1. Operate on [itex]F[/itex] with [itex]d[/itex] to produce [itex]dF[/itex].
  2. Take the Hodge dual, [itex]*dF[/itex].
  3. Operate on THAT with [itex]d[/itex], to produce [itex]d * dF[/itex]
This isn't necessarily zero, and is sort of like a higher-order derivative. In 3-D, if [itex]F[/itex] is a scalar function, then [itex]* d * d F = \nabla^2 F[/itex].
 
Orodruin said:
But at the same time no, there are no forms that are the second derivative of a function (as the OP suggests) as the exterior derivative applied twice gives zero (the any-dimensional equivalent of curl(grad(f))=0).

Of course there are other forms of higher order.
stevendaryl said:
Yes, [itex]d^2[/itex] always produces zero. However, you can get something sort of conceptually similar to [itex]d^2[/itex]:
  1. Operate on [itex]F[/itex] with [itex]d[/itex] to produce [itex]dF[/itex].
  2. Take the Hodge dual, [itex]*dF[/itex].
  3. Operate on THAT with [itex]d[/itex], to produce [itex]d * dF[/itex]
This isn't necessarily zero, and is sort of like a higher-order derivative. In 3-D, if [itex]F[/itex] is a scalar function, then [itex]* d * d F = \nabla^2 F[/itex].

In General Relativity one frequently deal with differential forms, say W. What actually is it? I know it has to be a completely antisymmetric (0,p) tensor. But what are its components Wμ1...μp? Would it be some array of derivatives of a function?
 
The components don't have to be derivatives. They are just antisymmetric, which makes threm taylor-fit for integration over manifolds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K