Differentiating a Hamiltonian - Is this a typo?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
In equation 5.8 in this document

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft/qft.pdf

I am trying to derive this Hamiltonian. I find

[itex]H= \pi \dot{\psi} - L = i \psi^\dagger \dot{\psi} - \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m ) \psi = i \bar{\psi} \gamma^0 \partial_0 \psi - i \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi = m \bar{\psi} \psi = \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma^i \partial_i + m ) \psi[/itex]

so I get a minus sign the other way around because of the defn of the dot product of 4 vectors [itex]\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu = \gamma^0 \partial_0 - \gamma^i \partial_i[/itex]

So does anyone else think this is a typo? I'm sure it isn't since he uses it in the following pages!

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


latentcorpse said:
[itex]\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu = \gamma^0 \partial_0 - \gamma^i \partial_i[/itex]

That's wrong. It should be
[itex]\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu = \gamma^0 \partial_0 + \gamma^i \partial_i[/itex]
by the Einstein summation convention.

The space-time derivative is acting to the right.