MHB Differentiating $\mathcal{E}$: How to Reach $\dot{x}(m\ddot{x} + kx)$?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the differentiation of the energy equation $\mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2$. Participants clarify that the correct form of kinetic energy includes the square of speed, leading to the derivative $\frac{d\mathcal{E}}{dt} = m\dot{x}\ddot{x} + kx\dot{x}$. The confusion arises from an incorrect initial formulation of energy, which led to a misinterpretation of the derivative. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the original energy equation in the book contains a typo, necessitating correction for accurate differentiation. This highlights the importance of precise definitions in physics equations.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
$\mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x} + \frac{1}{2}kx^2$
The derivative is
$$
\frac{d\mathcal{E}}{dt} = \frac{1}{2}m\ddot{x} + kx\dot{x}
$$
but the solution is suppose to be
$$
\frac{d\mathcal{E}}{dt} = \dot{x}(m\ddot{x} + kx).
$$
How?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
$\mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x} + \frac{1}{2}kx^2$
The derivative is
$$
\frac{d\mathcal{E}}{dt} = \frac{1}{2}m\ddot{x} + kx\dot{x}
$$
but the solution is suppose to be
$$
\frac{d\mathcal{E}}{dt} = \dot{x}(m\ddot{x} + kx).
$$
How?

Hi dwsmith! :)

The first part of your energy is the kinetic energy.
However, kinetic energy contains speed squared instead of just speed.
So your energy formula should be:

$\qquad \mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2$
 
I like Serena said:
Hi dwsmith! :)

The first part of your energy is the kinetic energy.
However, kinetic energy contains speed squared instead of just speed.
So your energy formula should be:

$\qquad \mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2$

The book has a typo then.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
802
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K