Differentiation formula: Is this a typo?

  • #1
240
17
TL;DR Summary
Resource found in the 'net, trying to know if this is a typo or not.
Red arrows.
1628420347688.png


The notes initially say that the error term is positive. After substitution of A and C which are clearly positive, the term suddenly became negative...? Is this a typo, or is there a theory behind this?
 
  • #2
It seems OK observing that the third term of (5.14) is f”(x).
 
Last edited:
  • #3
It seems OK observing that the third term of (5.14) is f”(x).
What does this imply? That either positive or negative will work?
 
  • #4
Summary:: Resource found in the 'net, trying to know if this is a typo or not.

Red arrows.
View attachment 287254

The notes initially say that the error term is positive. After substitution of A and C which are clearly positive, the term suddenly became negative...? Is this a typo, or is there a theory behind this?
It would seem to be the formula for an estimate of the error term in the Taylor series. Is this what your question was?
 
  • #5
forlmula(5.14).jpg


Transfer the second term of RHS to LHS.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
I finally got it! The notation was so confusing, sorry.

1628619319082.png


1628619341009.png
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak and WWGD

Suggested for: Differentiation formula: Is this a typo?

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
734
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
457
Replies
3
Views
689
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
780
Replies
3
Views
755
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top