Differentiation formula: Is this a typo?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
maistral
Messages
235
Reaction score
17
TL;DR
Resource found in the 'net, trying to know if this is a typo or not.
Red arrows.
1628420347688.png


The notes initially say that the error term is positive. After substitution of A and C which are clearly positive, the term suddenly became negative...? Is this a typo, or is there a theory behind this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anuttarasammyak said:
It seems OK observing that the third term of (5.14) is f”(x).
What does this imply? That either positive or negative will work?
 
maistral said:
Summary:: Resource found in the 'net, trying to know if this is a typo or not.

Red arrows.
View attachment 287254

The notes initially say that the error term is positive. After substitution of A and C which are clearly positive, the term suddenly became negative...? Is this a typo, or is there a theory behind this?
It would seem to be the formula for an estimate of the error term in the Taylor series. Is this what your question was?
 
I finally got it! The notation was so confusing, sorry.

1628619319082.png


1628619341009.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak and WWGD