Diffraction - central spot covers moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ducks_in_OR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Moon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the diameter of a radar antenna required to cover the Moon's central diffraction spot using the formula D=(2.44*λ*L)/(diameter of the moon). The values provided include a wavelength (λ) of 16.5 cm and a distance (L) of approximately 4x10^8 m. The initial calculation yielded a diameter (D) of 50.325 m, which was later questioned for accuracy. The participant also sought clarification on the origin of the constant 2.44 used in the formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diffraction patterns and their significance in radar technology
  • Familiarity with the formula for circular aperture diffraction
  • Basic knowledge of wavelength and its units of measurement
  • Ability to perform unit conversions and mathematical calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and significance of the constant 2.44 in diffraction calculations
  • Learn about radar antenna design principles and their applications
  • Explore the effects of wavelength on radar resolution and coverage
  • Investigate advanced diffraction theory and its applications in astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, radar system designers, and anyone interested in the practical applications of diffraction in astronomy and radar technology.

Ducks_in_OR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Moon is about 4x10^8 m from the Earth and has a diameter of about 3.2x10^6 m. You want a radar which just covers the Moon with the central spot of its diffraction pattern. If the radar has a wavelength of 16.5cm , what is the diameter of the radar antenna?

Homework Equations


Circular Aperture D=(2.44*λ*L)/(diameter of the moon)
D=diameter of the radar

The Attempt at a Solution


plugging in the values I found D=(2.44*(16.5*10^-2)*(4x10^8))/(3.2x10^6) and D=50.325m, which is incorrect. Am I making any incorrect assumptions, or is it the incorrect formula to be using for this type of problem.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell me where the 2.44 comes from? Maybe a URL?
 
no worries figured it out
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K