Diffraction grating white light problem

Click For Summary
The problem involves calculating the width of the first-order rainbow produced by white light (400-700nm) on a screen 2.0m behind a 600 line/mm diffraction grating. The approach includes using the equation d*sin(theta) = m * wavelength to find the angles for both 400nm and 700nm wavelengths, resulting in angles of 13.9 degrees and 24.8 degrees, respectively. The angle difference is then used to calculate the width of the spectrum on the screen using trigonometric functions. The final calculation suggests that the width of the projected rainbow is approximately 0.385m. This method emphasizes using the difference in lengths rather than angles for accurate results.
twiztidmxcn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hey

Here is the problem, I think I may be stuck but I'll provide all the information I have so far.

White light (400-700nm) is incident on a 600 line/mm diffraction grating. What is the width of the first order rainbow on a screen 2.0m behind the grating?

What I figured was to use the equation d*sin(theta) = m * wavelength

as well as the equation y = L*tan(theta), with L = 2.0m, m = 1 (first order rainbow),

Basically, I have to find theta, then find y, which ends up being the width of my projected rainbow. I am, however, totally stuck at this point. I'm not even sure if my assumption that m = 1 is right, or if I am on the right path.

Any help in the right direction would be awesome.

Thank you
twiztidmxcn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is probably not the best way, but the way that I would do that is to find theta when the wavelength is 400 nm, and then do the same to find the angle when the wavelength is 700 nm, then use a little trig and the difference between the angles to calculate the width of the spectrum.

calculate the angles by using
n\lambda = dsin\theta (n = 1, d = distance between the slits).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok, i had already used that equation for both and found

theta @ 400nm = 13.9 degrees
theta @ 700nm = 24.8 degrees

using the idea of finding the angle difference (10.9 degrees), then using trig we find that tan(theta) = y / x, y = tan (theta) * x, where x = 2m and theta is the angle difference that i calculated?

thus leaving me with something like y = 2m * tan (10.9) = .385m?
 
Last edited:
The difference between the angles doesn't help you here because \tan{\theta_2} - \tan{\theta_1} does not equal \tan (\theta_2 - \theta_1).
 
I think I get what you mean

It makes more sense with that explanation, and helps me to reason that since x*tan(theta) = y, y2 - y1 = x(tan(theta2)-tan(theta1)).

What you were saying is to use the difference of lengths rather than angle because... well of what you said.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
972
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K