Diffraction grating problem involving Snell's Law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a diffraction grating problem involving Snell's Law, specifically examining the diffraction angles of a laser beam passing through a glass aquarium wall and subsequently through water. The problem includes calculations for first-order diffraction angles under different conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the first-order diffraction angle using Snell's Law and the diffraction equation but questions their assumption regarding the angle of incidence. Participants discuss the implications of assuming a perpendicular incidence and explore the meaning of the angles involved in the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the assumptions made about the angles and the setup of the diffraction grating. Some guidance is offered regarding the angle of incidence when the laser hits the glass perpendicularly, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the orientation of the diffraction grating in relation to the laser beam, which may affect the interpretation of the angles involved. Additionally, the original poster expresses confusion about the results obtained from their calculations, indicating potential misunderstandings of the equations and their variables.

Sarah Hallsway
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 600 line/mm diffraction grating is in an empty aquarium tank. The index of refraction of the glass walls is [n][/glass] = 1.50. A helium-neon laser (lambda=633 nm) is outside the aquarium. The laser beam passes through the glass wall and illuminates the diffraction grating.

a. What is the first order diffraction of the laser beam?
b. What is the first-order diffraction angle of the laser beam after the aquarium is filled with water? ([n][/water] = 1.33)

Homework Equations


Diffraction equation= m(lambda)=d(sin(theta1)+sin(theta2))
where m= diffraction order
d= grating spacing
theta 1= incident angle
theta 2= diffraction angle

and possibly Snell's law,
n1sin(theta1)=n2sin(theta2)

The Attempt at a Solution


My first try at a gave me the answer -41.80 degrees as the angle of diffraction. I assumed that the incoming angle (from the laser to the glass of the aquarium) was 90, then used snell's law to calculate the angle at which the laser bent, which was 41.81 degrees. I used 41.81 degrees in the diffraction gradient equation I provided above and got my theta2 to be equal to -41.80 degrees.

I know I probably went wrong assuming that the incoming angle was 90, and I also noticed that theta1 and theta2 were very similar which is not usually the case for diffraction gradient problems.

If someone could even just point me in the right direction, I would be very appreciative. For reference, the correct answers to this problem are a. 23.3 degrees and b. 16.6 degrees. Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
Sarah Hallsway said:
I assumed that the incoming angle (from the laser to the glass of the aquarium) was 90, then used snell's law to calculate the angle at which the laser bent, which was 41.81 degrees.
If the laser light hits the glass of the aquarium perpendicularly to the glass, what is the angle of incidence of the laser light that you would use in Snell's law?
 
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

If the laser light hits the glass of the aquarium perpendicularly to the glass, what is the angle of incidence of the laser light that you would use in Snell's law?

Oh, it would be 0, right? When I use 0 for theta0 in snell's law, I get that theta1 also equals 0, and when I put that into the equation m(lambda)=d(sin(theta1)+sin(theta2)), I get an extremely small value for the first order diffraction angle (theta2). Where am I going wrong?

Also, is the diffraction grating on the bottom of the tank or on the sides? In other words, is the laser pointer parallel to the diffraction grating or perpendicular?
 
Sarah Hallsway said:
Oh, it would be 0, right?
Yes.
When I use 0 for theta0 in snell's law, I get that theta1 also equals 0,
I'm not sure what angle theta1 refers to.
and when I put that into the equation m(lambda)=d(sin(theta1)+sin(theta2)), I get an extremely small value for the first order diffraction angle (theta2). Where am I going wrong?
Can you explain the meaning of theta1 and theta2?

Also, is the diffraction grating on the bottom of the tank or on the sides? In other words, is the laser pointer parallel to the diffraction grating or perpendicular?
I would assume that the laser beam hits the grating at right angles to the plane of the grating.
upload_2017-1-31_20-35-1.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K