Diffraction grating white light problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a diffraction grating with white light (400-700nm) incident on it, specifically a 600 line/mm grating. The objective is to determine the width of the first order rainbow on a screen located 2.0m behind the grating.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the equation d*sin(theta) = m * wavelength to find the angle theta for different wavelengths, and then applying trigonometric relationships to calculate the width of the spectrum on the screen.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their calculations for the angles corresponding to the extreme wavelengths and are exploring the relationship between these angles and the width of the projected rainbow. There is an ongoing clarification regarding the correct application of trigonometric functions in relation to angle differences.

Contextual Notes

Participants are questioning the validity of their assumptions regarding the order of the rainbow and the method of calculating the width based on angle differences. There is a focus on ensuring the correct interpretation of trigonometric relationships in the context of the problem.

twiztidmxcn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hey

Here is the problem, I think I may be stuck but I'll provide all the information I have so far.

White light (400-700nm) is incident on a 600 line/mm diffraction grating. What is the width of the first order rainbow on a screen 2.0m behind the grating?

What I figured was to use the equation d*sin(theta) = m * wavelength

as well as the equation y = L*tan(theta), with L = 2.0m, m = 1 (first order rainbow),

Basically, I have to find theta, then find y, which ends up being the width of my projected rainbow. I am, however, totally stuck at this point. I'm not even sure if my assumption that m = 1 is right, or if I am on the right path.

Any help in the right direction would be awesome.

Thank you
twiztidmxcn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is probably not the best way, but the way that I would do that is to find theta when the wavelength is 400 nm, and then do the same to find the angle when the wavelength is 700 nm, then use a little trig and the difference between the angles to calculate the width of the spectrum.

calculate the angles by using
n\lambda = dsin\theta (n = 1, d = distance between the slits).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok, i had already used that equation for both and found

theta @ 400nm = 13.9 degrees
theta @ 700nm = 24.8 degrees

using the idea of finding the angle difference (10.9 degrees), then using trig we find that tan(theta) = y / x, y = tan (theta) * x, where x = 2m and theta is the angle difference that i calculated?

thus leaving me with something like y = 2m * tan (10.9) = .385m?
 
Last edited:
The difference between the angles doesn't help you here because \tan{\theta_2} - \tan{\theta_1} does not equal \tan (\theta_2 - \theta_1).
 
I think I get what you mean

It makes more sense with that explanation, and helps me to reason that since x*tan(theta) = y, y2 - y1 = x(tan(theta2)-tan(theta1)).

What you were saying is to use the difference of lengths rather than angle because... well of what you said.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K