Diffrentiating Piecewise Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the piecewise function defined as h(x) = sin(1/x) for x ≠ 0 and h(0) = L. It is established that h is not continuous at x = 0, as demonstrated through a proof by contradiction using the hint provided by the professor, which suggests taking ε = 1/2. The participants clarify that while differentiability implies continuity, the reverse is not true, as exemplified by the function |x|, which is continuous at x = 0 but not differentiable there.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piecewise functions
  • Knowledge of limits and continuity in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of differentiability
  • Basic principles of proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of piecewise functions in depth
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Explore examples of functions that are continuous but not differentiable
  • Investigate the implications of differentiability on continuity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on continuity and differentiability, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to piecewise functions.

RPierre
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let [tex]L\in R[/tex] and define

[tex] h(x) = \begin{cases} sin(1/x) & \text{ if } x \neq 0 \\ L & \text{ if } x = 0 \end{cases}[/tex]

Prove that h is not continuous at 0

Homework Equations



My Professor gave us the hint "Prove by contradiction, taking [tex]\epsilon = 1/2[/tex]"


The Attempt at a Solution



I didn't see how this hint was relevant, but it seems too easy. All I did was say since a function is continuous at a point if it is differentiable at that point, then take 0. then h(x) = L and by first principles

lim h->0 f(x +h) - f(x) / h = L/0 which does not exist, and therefore the function is not continuous.

Why would he give that hint, and the piecewise function, when it could be proven so simply? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that differentiability implies continuity, but the converse is false. Lack of differentiability does not imply lack of continuity, consider |x| which is continuous when x=0 dispite failing to be differentiable. For continuity consider the family of punctured disks (-n pi,n pi)\0 where n is a positive integer.
 
Last edited:
Note that sin(1/x)= 1 for [itex]x= 1/(2n\pi)[/itex] for any integer n and that sin(1/x)= -1 for [itex]x= 1/((2n+1)\pi)[/itex] for any integer n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K