Dilemma of pursuing only one major

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CivilSigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dilemma of pursuing a single major in education, particularly in the context of civil engineering, and the feelings of regret or curiosity about other fields such as mathematics, software development, game development, and quantum physics. Participants explore the implications of focusing on one area versus branching out into multiple disciplines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses feelings of regret about not studying other topics and questions how to deal with these thoughts.
  • Another participant argues that being a "jack-of-all-trades" may lead to a lack of deep insight in any one area, emphasizing the need for full-time dedication to master a subject.
  • It is suggested that one cannot simply pick up a complex subject like quantum physics and expect to apply it effectively without substantial effort and understanding.
  • Some participants propose that focusing on a specific area does not preclude one from exploring other fields, as skills can be transferable across disciplines.
  • A participant shares their experience of working in engineering despite having switched from an engineering major to physics, indicating that interdisciplinary work is possible.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the type of engineering work done by a physicist, showing interest in practical applications.
  • A later reply provides specific examples of engineering projects, such as particle accelerators and thin-film deposition systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the value of specializing in one major versus exploring multiple fields. There is no consensus on the best approach to education and career development.

Contextual Notes

Participants' arguments depend on personal experiences and assumptions about the nature of learning and mastery in various fields. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of pursuing multiple disciplines versus specializing.

CivilSigma
Messages
227
Reaction score
58
Do you ever feel or think about what could have been if I studied this topic instead of that? How do you deal with it?

Because when ever I read wikis about topics say in mathematics , software development , game development, quantum physics etc... I think to myself how cool if I studied those instead. Don't get me wrong, I like what I am studying now (civil engineering) but I just can't help my self think of the what if because I know I can lean them and probably do something useful with them, which really promotes this existential crisis.

Source for this though provoking post: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sakonpure6 said:
Do you ever feel or think about what could have been if I studied this topic instead of that? How do you deal with it?

Because when ever I read wikis about topics say in mathematics , software development , game development, quantum physics etc... I think to myself how cool if I studied those instead. Don't get me wrong, I like what I am studying now (civil engineering) but I just can't help my self think of the what if because I know I can lean them and probably do something useful with them, which really promotes this existential crisis.

Source for this though provoking post: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning

1. You could be a jack-of-all-trades and master of NONE. Why? Because to be a master at something requires full-time dedication, hard work, and a lot of effort, something you can't spread over too many different areas (unless you are a superhuman). So you will likely end up not providing deep insight into anything.

2. You can't simply pick up, say, "quantum physics" and think that you can "do something useful" with it. This is a fallacy. It is not a book that you can pick up, read, and then understand. That's like saying you can pick up a hammer, and thus, you should be able to build a house. The same can be said about the other subject matter you listed.

3. Focusing on a particular area does not exclude you from going into another area, especially if the knowledge and/or expertise/skill can be applied elsewhere. As a physicist, I find that 75% of my work is in engineering. I design and then build stuff, which is interesting because I entered my undergraduate program as an engineering major before switching to physics. There is nothing here that says that one must be confined only to such-and-such an area based on the subject area printed on the diploma.

I have zero qualms about pursuing "only one major".

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma
Thank you for the response.

ZapperZ said:
You could be a jack-of-all-trades and master of NONE
ZapperZ said:
pick up a hammer, and thus, you should be able to build a house

These two points really put it into perspective for me.

May I ask you what type of engineering , stuff you build as a physicist?
 
sakonpure6 said:
May I ask you what type of engineering , stuff you build as a physicist?

Particle accelerator and thin-film deposition system.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K