Dimensional Analysis - Schrödinger equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying dimensional analysis to the harmonic oscillator's potential energy function, specifically V(x) = (m ω² x²) / 2. Participants aim to derive a dimensionless Schrödinger equation by substituting x with dimensionless factors using x₀ = sqrt(ħ/(m ω)). The known energy solutions for the harmonic oscillator, Eₙ = (n + 1/2)ħω, are also translated into dimensionless energies ~E. Key insights include the elimination of mass (m) and angular frequency (ω) through simultaneous equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis techniques.
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators in quantum systems.
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for typesetting mathematical equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive dimensionless quantities in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the application of dimensional analysis in other quantum systems.
  • Explore the implications of the harmonic oscillator solutions in quantum field theory.
  • Practice typesetting complex equations in LaTeX for clarity in presentations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and dimensional analysis, as well as educators looking to enhance their teaching of these concepts.

astro_girl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To illustrate the abstract reduction to dimensionless quantities apply it to the harmonic oscillator
V(x) = (m \omega^2 x^2) / 2
using x_0 = sqrt(h-bar/(m \omega))
and fi nd a dimensionless Schrodinger equation. Translate the known solutions to the Schrodinger
equation for the harmonic oscillator E_n = (n + 1/2)h-bar\omega
into the allowed energies ~E of the dimensionless Schrodinger equation.

I know this has to do with dimensional analysis, but I was sick when we had that class, and I've been searching for help on the internet the whole day without any luck. I don't think it is too difficult, I just don't really get what I have to do.

I guess the \omega and the m have to go, but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use LaTeX if you surround your equations by double $ or double # (for inline mode).

Can you re-write V in such a way that it just has factors of (x/x_0) instead of x?
Can you do something similar for the energies?
 
Welcome to PF;
I agree with mfb, but would put it differently...
I guess the \omega and the m have to go, but how?
You eliminate them using your simultaneous equations.
LaTeX makes the equations clearer like this:

(1) $$V(x) = \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2$$(2) $$x_0=\sqrt{ \frac{\hbar}{m\omega} }$$(are those correct?) i.e. for (2) don't you want ##x_0:V(x_0)=\frac{1}{2}\hbar## ?

Initially it looks like you have two equations and three unknowns - but ... notice how ##m\omega## always appear together in these equations? Maybe you can eliminate them together? (well... sort of)

... anyway - there's a third equation:
(3) $$E_n=\cdots$$

It will lead you down mfb's line... you are looking for ##V/E_n## in terms of ##x/x_0## ... treated that way you have three equations with three unknowns ... you just have to identify the unknowns. This you do by experience and you get that by trial and error.To see how I typeset the equations (essential for QM and useful elsewhere) just click on the "quote" button at the bottom of this post ;)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K