MHB Dimensions of a rectangular prism

Madds
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The volume of a rectangular prism can be represented by the polynomial
V(x)=2x^2+9x^2+4x-15
a. The depth of the tank is (x-1) feet. The length is 13 feet. Assume the length is the greatest dimension. Which linear factor represents the 13 ft?This is probably a really easy question but I am so confused reading it, I really need help on how to do these kinds of problems.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Help with an equation problem

I am assuming the volume is the cubic polynomial:

$$V(x)=2x^3+9x^2+4x-15$$

We are told the depth is $x-1$, so we know $1$ is a zero of the polynomial...so let's use synthetic division:

$$\begin{array}{c|rr}& 2 & 9 & 4 & -15 \\ 1 & & 2 & 11 & 15 \\ \hline & 2 & 11 & 15 & 0 \end{array}$$

So, we now know:

$$V(x)=(x-1)\left(2x^2+11x+15\right)$$

Now we need to factor the quadratic factor...

$$V(x)=(x-1)(2x+5)(x+3)$$

What value of $x$ makes the largest factor equal to 13?
 
Re: Help with an equation problem

As a followup, we can determine which value of $x$ makes the largest factor 13 by looking at the following graph:

View attachment 7450

We can easily see that when $x=4$, the largest linear factor is $2x+5=13$. The dimensions of the tank are:

$$3\text{ ft}\times7\text{ ft}\times13\text{ ft}$$
 

Attachments

  • prismfactors.png
    prismfactors.png
    17.8 KB · Views: 98
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top