Diplomatic resolution of U.S. - China proprietary debt

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China Debt Resolution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of U.S. debt to China, estimated at around 2 trillion dollars, particularly in the context of patent violations and industrial espionage. Participants explore how these factors might influence the modification of this debt, touching on economic relationships and historical practices in manufacturing and trade.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that China's actions, including patent violations and industrial espionage, undermine the U.S. economy and complicate the debt situation.
  • One participant shares personal experiences regarding China's manufacturing practices, noting their willingness to sell products at a loss and their approach to reverse engineering, which they believe may affect future negotiations.
  • There is a question about the ownership of the Chinese portion of U.S. debt, with speculation about its ties to state-run banks and military manufacturing capacity.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding China's needs and desires in order to address the debt issue effectively.
  • One participant expresses a belief that Donald Trump's approach to dealing with China should not be entirely dismissed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of China's economic practices and the ownership of U.S. debt, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference personal experiences and observations, which may not encompass broader economic data or trends. The discussion includes assumptions about the motivations and behaviors of Chinese entities in the context of U.S. debt and trade practices.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
The U.S. owes China around 2 trillion dollars. How might patent violations and industrial espionage by China (and the U.S.) figure in modifying this debt? In that regard it seems to me that China is undermining the U.S. economy by being the stealthiest of thieves. Can the debt be further resolved by fairness?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
The U.S. owes China around 2 trillion dollars. How might patent violations and industrial espionage by China (and the U.S.) figure in modifying this debt? In that regard it seems to me that China is undermining the U.S. economy by being the stealthiest of thieves. Can the debt be further resolved by fairness?

Label this opinion - based on personal experience only.

The Chinese were willing to sell products at a loss to fill manufacturing capacity 10 years ago. They were also willing (in some cases) to make investments in new equipment and purchase old equipment and supplies relocated to China. In most cases they required a specific volume purchase - for inexpensive (junk) items normally increments of 1 million units - for large items a dollar amount. They like to deal in container quantities.

Now, if there were over-committments of volume or change orders - they viewed this as a breach of the agreement. In the early days, you could not call China and tell them to stop the production line - they would just keep making the items and pile them high. if you didn't take delivery - they dumped them anywhere they could at or above the price you agreed to pay.

Also - they have an appetite for reverse engineering - sometimes they find a way to lower production costs and sometimes they "invent" a new product.

Again IMO - now that they don't have to sell products at a loss - they are going to test all of the limits.

The key is to find out what they want and or need - and address them head-on. Continued IMO - Donald Trump does know a little bit about dealing with the Chinese - he shouldn't be discounted (wholesale) on this topic.
 
Last edited:
What entity does own the 'Chineese' portion of the US debt? I thought it was a Sino-bank of some sort? (Which I support may be 100% government ran, but still)
 
mege said:
What entity does own the 'Chineese' portion of the US debt? I thought it was a Sino-bank of some sort? (Which I support may be 100% government ran, but still)

That's a valid legal question. However, if you look closely at the "ownership" of the manufacturing base you might just identify a trend - high level Party affiliation - and in some cases the use of excess military manufacturing capacity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 147 ·
5
Replies
147
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K