Dirac Delta as Gaussian functions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 6K views
rajetk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am looking at a problem, part of which deals with expressing delta dirac as a limiting case of gaussian function. I am aware of the standard ways of doing it. In addition, I would also like to know if the following are correct -
[tex] \delta(x-a) = \lim_{\sigma \rightarrow{0}} \int_{a - \sigma}^{{a + \sigma}} \sqrt{\frac{1}{2\pi \sigma^{2}}}e^{-((x-a)^{2})/(2\sigma^{2})} dx[/tex]

Or can I say something like the following -
[tex] \lim_{\sigma \rightarrow{0+}} \int_{a - \sigma}^{{a + \sigma}} \sqrt{\frac{1}{2\pi \sigma^{2}}}e^{-((x-a)^{2})/(2\sigma^{2})} dx[/tex]

where the second expression is not a delta function but its approximation (since both the a+ and a- regions are considered in the integral)?

Please do excuse me if I am seriously wrong :(. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one is correct, I'm not sure what you're saying about the second one. It looks like the only difference is that sigma is approaching zero from the positive side
 
Neither is correct. For one thing, where is the x on the right hand side? It is not the dummy variable of the integration; that you happened to use x is somewhat misleading. You could have called that dummy variable t, u, or anything without changing the value of the integral. It is just a dummy variable.

That missing x is just a tiny nitpick compared to the bigger problem of using an integral. In the limit of sigma going to zero, that integral will become a unit step function, not a Dirac delta distribution.

You just want the Gaussian, non-integrated.