Dirac delta function in 2d polar coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Dirac delta function in two-dimensional polar coordinates, specifically the expression $$\triangledown \cdot \frac{\hat{\textbf{r}}}{r}=2π\delta^2(\textbf{r})$$. This is derived from the known result in three-dimensional spherical coordinates, $$\triangledown \cdot \frac{\hat{\textbf{r}}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(\textbf{r})$$, as referenced in David J. Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics". The integral over the two-dimensional space confirms that the result is indeed 2π. The divergence theorem is suggested as a method to verify these results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac delta function
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates
  • Knowledge of the divergence theorem
  • Basic concepts in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac delta function in various dimensions
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its applications in physics
  • Explore vector calculus in polar coordinates
  • Review Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" for deeper insights on delta functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying electromagnetism or advanced calculus who seek to understand the application of the Dirac delta function in different coordinate systems.

Trollfaz
Messages
144
Reaction score
16
In 3 d spherical coordinates we know that
$$\triangledown \cdot \frac{\hat{\textbf{r}}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(\textbf{r})$$
Integration over all## R^3## is 4π
So when we remove the third dimensions and enter 2d polar coordinates then
$$\triangledown \cdot \frac{\hat{\textbf{r}}}{r}=2π\delta^2(\textbf{r})$$
So the integral over ##R^2## is 2π?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, note that your expressions are not written in any particular coordinates (apart from the interpretation of ##r## as a coordinate function and ##\hat{\boldsymbol r}## as the corresponding unit vector. In particular, the delta functions are not the product of the coordinate delta functions.

Apart from that: Yes. You can easily check the result by use of the divergence theorem and integration over a sphere/circle. In fact, that is one way to find the constant factors in front.
 
I'm quoting the first expression from Introductions to Electrodynamics (David J. Griffiths) Section 1.5.3, Eqn 1.99
$$\triangle \cdot \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(r)$$
 
Trollfaz said:
I'm quoting the first expression from Introductions to Electrodynamics (David J. Griffiths) Section 1.5.3, Eqn 1.99
$$\triangle \cdot \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(r)$$
You are missing the point (and hopefully misquoting Griffiths as the expression as written here makes no sense). The expression in your OP was correct. My comment was that it was not really something dependent on using spherical coordinates.
 
right, integral in ##R^3-B_\epsilon(0)##, and use divergence thm

if your are curious about the equation everypoint (specially point 0), that is Dirac delta, try to understand it as a functional like ##<\delta, \varphi>##, that is ## \int \limits_{R^3} \delta \varphi ##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K