How can integration by parts be used to prove the Dirac delta function?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using integration by parts to prove the relationship involving the Dirac delta function and its derivatives. The integral of f(x) multiplied by the derivative of the delta function, δ'(x), is explored, with an emphasis on correctly identifying u and dv in the integration by parts formula. Participants clarify that the first term in the integration by parts expression approaches zero because the delta function decays rapidly outside its defined point. The rapid decay of the delta function ensures that it effectively nullifies contributions from f(x) as x approaches infinity. Understanding these principles allows for a clearer application of integration by parts in proving the stated relationship.
zandria
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement
Show that:
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) \delta^{(n)}(x-a) dx = (-1)^n f^{(n)}(a)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to understand how to prove:
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) \delta '(x) dx =- f'(x)
I know that we need to use integration by parts, but I'm looking for a more detailed explanation of how to use integration by parts (what is u and what is dv?). I think if I understand this, then I will be able to apply this to the problem above.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
u is f(x), dv is \delta'(x) dx.
 
I think you left out a minus sign. There's only one thing there than can be 'u' and only one thing that can be 'dv'.
 
thank you, i did leave out a minus sign. I will correct that above. Also, I think I was trying to make things more complicated than they actually are. But why does the first term when doing integration by parts go to zero?

\boxed{[f(x)\delta(x)]_{-\infty}^{\infty}} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f'(x)\delta(x) dx
 
zandria said:
I am trying to understand how to prove the simple statement:
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) \delta '(x) dx =- f'(x)
I thought it was a definition of delta-function derivative... could someone tell me if I'm wrong?
 
zandria said:
But why does the first term when doing integration by parts go to zero?
All that is necessary for the first term to go to zero is that delta goes to zero faster than f goes to infinity. How fast does delta go to zero?
 
delta tends to zero very quickly when x does not equal a (which is zero in this case) by definition of the generalized function . If that's right, then I think I get it. Thank you for your help.
 
zandria said:
delta tends to zero very quickly when x does not equal a (which is zero in this case) by definition of the generalized function . If that's right, then I think I get it. Thank you for your help.
Yes, that is correct. delta of x thuds to zero immediately x leaves 0, long before x gets to infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K