Dirac Notation and Magnitude of Bra's Help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Dirac notation in quantum mechanics, specifically in proving the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality using the expression || a|x> + b|y> ||^2. The user confirms the correctness of their simplification involving the inner products a^{*}a + a^{*}b + b^{*}a + b^{*}b. They also mention the need to substitute a = - and b = to complete the proof. The calculations involving bra and ket notations are validated as correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac notation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in Hilbert spaces
  • Learn about the implications of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore advanced applications of Dirac notation in quantum state representation
  • Review complex number algebra in the context of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling assignments involving Dirac notation and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, as well as educators teaching these concepts.

NeedPhysHelp8
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was diving into my 3rd year quantum assignment and I saw the following which I have to use for the rest of the question to prove the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality:

Homework Statement



|| a|x> + b|y> ||^2

I only really learned a bit about Dirac notation last year, so please let me know if this simplification is right.

( a|x> + b|y> )^{*}( a|x> + b|y> )
a^{*}a<x|x> + a^{*}b<x|y> + b^{*}a<y|x> + b^{*}b<y|y>

Later it says to make substitutions for a= -<x|y> , b= <x|x> to prove the inequality, but I want to make sure I didn't screw up the very first part above...which I have a feeling I did.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The multiplications with bra's and kets are correctly done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K