Dirac Notation - Position and Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Dirac notation in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the relationship between position and momentum operators. The original poster seeks to demonstrate a specific mathematical expression involving the momentum operator and the Dirac delta function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the manipulation of Dirac notation and the implications of inserting complete sets of states. There are attempts to clarify the mathematical expressions and the need for integrals in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided suggestions for formatting and clarity in the expressions used. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between different components of the Dirac notation, with several participants questioning their understanding of the complete set and the definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the necessity of certain integrals and the proper setup of the expressions. There is also mention of confusion stemming from prior study materials and the complexity of the concepts being discussed.

atomicpedals
Messages
202
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Show that [itex]\left\langle[/itex]x|p|x'[itex]\right\rangle[/itex] = [itex]\hbar[/itex]/i [itex]\partial[/itex]/[itex]\partial[/itex]x [itex]\delta[/itex](x-x')

2. The attempt at a solution

[itex]\left\langle[/itex]x|p|x'[itex]\right\rangle[/itex] = i[itex]\hbar[/itex] [itex]\delta[/itex](x-x')/(x-x') = i[itex]\hbar[/itex] [itex]\partial[/itex]/[itex]\partial[/itex]x' [itex]\delta[/itex](x-x') = [itex]\hbar[/itex]/i [itex]\partial[/itex]/[itex]\partial[/itex]x [itex]\delta[/itex](x-x')

For the sake of formality I think I need an integral after my first equals sign which I think would be:

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\delta[/itex](x-x') p [itex]\delta[/itex](x-x') dx'= p[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\delta[/itex](x-x') p [itex]\delta[/itex](x-x') dx'

However I'm not sure if a) it's needed, or b) if I set it up correctly. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion: If you're going to use LaTeX, use it for the entire expression instead of individual symbols. Fixed your post up:
atomicpedals said:

Homework Statement



Show that [itex]\langle x|\hat{p}|x'\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\delta(x-x')[/itex]

2. The attempt at a solution
[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle<br /> = i \hbar \,\delta(x-x')/(x-x') <br /> = i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} \delta(x-x')<br /> = \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \delta(x-x')[/tex]
For the sake of formality I think I need an integral after my first equals sign which I think would be:
[tex]\int \delta(x-x') \hat{p} \delta(x-x')\,dx'= p\int\delta(x-x') \hat{p} \delta(x-x')\, dx'[/tex]
However I'm not sure if a) it's needed, or b) if I set it up correctly. Any help would be appreciated!
I actually don't follow what you're doing here at all. :wink: Try inserting a complete set:
[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle\langle p |x' \rangle \,dp[/tex]
 
So, I was right... in that I was wrong! :)

I'll go back and work with the complete set.
 
I'm going to call out my own ignorance (probably related to having spent too much time with a QM book causing less clarity instead of more):

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle\langle p |x' \rangle \,dp[/tex]

I don't see how this is the complete set. (If that question made sense, I'm on a good start.)

Shouldn't we have:

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle dp \langle p |x' \rangle \[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
Wait, does this work?

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle\langle p |x' \rangle \,dp[/tex]

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \hbar /i \int \delta(x-x') \langle p |x' \rangle \,dp[/tex]

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = ( \hbar /i ) ( d/dx ) \delta(x-x')[/tex]
 
What are [itex]\langle p \vert x' \rangle[/itex] and [itex]\langle x \lvert \hat{p} \vert p \rangle[/itex] equal to?
 
Just a side note:
atomicpedals said:
I'm going to call out my own ignorance (probably related to having spent too much time with a QM book causing less clarity instead of more):

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle\langle p |x' \rangle \,dp[/tex]

I don't see how this is the complete set. (If that question made sense, I'm on a good start.)

Shouldn't we have:

[tex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle = \int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle dp \langle p |x' \rangle[/tex]?
They're the same thing. [itex]\mathrm{d}p[/itex] is a pure number and thus commutes with everything, in particular [itex]\langle p|x'\rangle[/itex].
 
The easier question to answer is what is [itex]\langle p \vert x' \rangle[/itex] equal to

[itex]\langle p \vert x' \rangle = 1/ \sqrt{2 \pi \hbar} exp( (i/ \hbar) p x')[/itex]

The more important question is then what does [itex]\langle x \lvert \hat{p} \vert p \rangle[/itex] equal, because I don't think I know anymore! Except to say that it has matrix elements (and I'm not sure what those are).
 
Surely you must know what [itex]\hat{p}\vert p\rangle[/itex] is equal to.
 
  • #10
Well my first gut reply is that

[itex]\hat{p}\vert p\rangle = p\vert p\rangle[/itex]
 
  • #11
Right, so [itex]\langle x | \hat{p} | p \rangle = \langle x | p | p \rangle = p\langle x | p \rangle[/itex].
 
  • #12
Ah right! Ok, so what's the mathematical reasoning that gets me from [itex]\langle x| \hat{p} |x' \rangle[/itex] to [itex]\int \langle x | \hat{p} | p\rangle\langle p |x' \rangle \,dp[/itex] ? I'm really trying to understand the basic underpinnings of what's going on.
 
  • #13
I'm considerably more comfortable with the original problem. Now I've got a follow up (thanks to yesterday's class). We have

[itex]\langle x | \hat{p} | p \rangle = \langle x | p | p \rangle = p\langle x | p \rangle[/itex]

If [itex]p = i / (\hbar) d/dx[/itex] and [itex]\langle x | p \rangle = 1 / ( \sqrt{2 \pi \hbar} ) exp[ (i / \hbar) p x) ][/itex] How do I go about determining matrix elements? Is it as simple as the product of p and [itex]\langle x | p \rangle[/itex] and then taking x = 0,1,2,...?
 
  • #14
No. I don't understand what you're trying to do.
 
  • #15
I would like to determine matrix elements for [itex]\langle x | \hat{p} | p \rangle[/itex].
 
  • #16
I think you're confusing the operator [itex]\hat{p}[/itex] with the eigenvalue [itex]p[/itex] of the momentum eigenstate [itex]\vert p \rangle[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K