Direction of current as bar magnet moves uniformly through copper ring

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meow12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
As a bar magnet moves downward through a stationary copper ring, the magnetic flux through the ring decreases, resulting in a positive induced electromotive force (emf) and a counterclockwise current when viewed from above. The flux reaches a minimum as the magnet is midway through the ring, at which point the induced current momentarily stops, reverses direction, and eventually dies out as the magnet moves away. The induced current opposes the motion of the magnet, creating a repulsive force when the magnet approaches and an attractive force when it is below the ring. The response of the induced current is antisymmetric about the midway point due to geometrical symmetry. Overall, Lenz's law effectively describes the current's behavior in relation to the magnet's motion.
Meow12
Messages
46
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
Analyze the direction of electric current in a stationary copper ring as a bar magnet moves through it at constant velocity north-pole first.
Relevant Equations
##\Phi_B=\vec{B}\cdot\vec{A}##

##\displaystyle\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}##
magnet-ring.png

Suppose the ring is held stationary such that its area vector points upward. The magnet moves downward toward the ring at constant velocity north-pole first. (The starting position is shown in the figure.)

Since ##\vec{B}## is downward while ##\vec{A}## is upward, ##\Phi_B=\vec{B}\cdot\vec{A}## is negative and decreasing (becoming more negative). So, ##\displaystyle\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}## is negative. Thus, ##\displaystyle\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}## is positive. By the right-hand rule, the induced current in the ring flows counterclockwise when viewed from above.

##\Phi_B## keeps decreasing until it reaches its minimum (##\displaystyle\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}=0##) when the magnet is midway through the ring. Then, ##\Phi_B## starts increasing (becoming less negative). So, ##\displaystyle\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}## is positive. ##\displaystyle\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}## becomes zero (at the minimum of ##\Phi_B##), then becomes negative, and eventually becomes zero when the magnet is far away from the ring. By the right-hand rule, the induced current stops momentarily, reverses direction (flows clockwise when viewed from above), and eventually dies out.

Does this look okay? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could also mention that the response should be antisymmetric about the midway point because of the geometrical symmetry.
 
And perhaps sketch what the emf looks like as a function of time.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Meow12
One quick way to get the current-direction is to use Lenz’s law.

As the bar magnet moves down (N-pole first) towards the ring, its motion will be opposed by the field produced by the induced current. So we know the induced field will have the 'N-pole' at the top, causing repulsion.

Applying the RH rule, the current's direction - to make the induced field’s N-pole at the top - will be anticlockwise (UK!) (viewed from above).

Similarly when the bar magnet is below the ring and moving down, the induced field must have the 'N-pole' at the bottom causing attraction.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top