Direction of friction when a body moves in a circular track?

Click For Summary
In uniform circular motion, friction acts as the centripetal force, enabling the vehicle to maintain its circular path without slipping. In this case, friction is directed towards the center of the circular track, opposing any tendency of the vehicle to move outward. In non-uniform circular motion, friction not only provides centripetal force but also acts tangentially to oppose changes in speed, either accelerating or decelerating the vehicle. This dual role of friction in non-uniform motion contrasts with its singular role in uniform motion. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of vehicles on circular tracks.
ajaysabarish
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
please explain why?
Take 2 cases,and explain how is the direction of friction different in these 2 cases.

CASE 1:uniform circular motion
CASE 2:non uniform circular motion

my thought was,friction opposes relative motion,so it must be tangential to the particle at each and every point.
i very well know this is wrong,but i need to know why?please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say that friction opposes relative motion, you are being too specific (although one could actually be more specific by saying that the motion has to be between two objects in contact, in a direction parallel to the contact plane). What you should really say is that friction is a force that acts against any motion parallel to and between the two surfaces, and against any force that tries to create such motion.

In circular motion, there is of course tangential friction opposing the motion of the particle, but we also need some way of maintaining the circular path. In space, this is done by gravity, but think about steering your car. You turn the front wheels, which then push the ground away from where you are turning. The ground produces a force that acts opposite to this, and your direction changes the way you want it to. This is centripetal force, which you might have heard of if you've studied circular motion. In the case of the turning car and the particle you've described, the centripetal force is friction.

I'm not sure what you're referring to exactly with the two cases. Perhaps you forgot to finish the question?
 
sk1105 said:
When you say that friction opposes relative motion, you are being too specific (although one could actually be more specific by saying that the motion has to be between two objects in contact, in a direction parallel to the contact plane). What you should really say is that friction is a force that acts against any motion parallel to and between the two surfaces, and against any force that tries to create such motion.

In circular motion, there is of course tangential friction opposing the motion of the particle, but we also need some way of maintaining the circular path. In space, this is done by gravity, but think about steering your car. You turn the front wheels, which then push the ground away from where you are turning. The ground produces a force that acts opposite to this, and your direction changes the way you want it to. This is centripetal force, which you might have heard of if you've studied circular motion. In the case of the turning car and the particle you've described, the centripetal force is friction.

I'm not sure what you're referring to exactly with the two cases. Perhaps you forgot to finish the question?
Thank you for replying sir,do you mean to say there will be 2 components?centripetel and tangential?i know about circular motion but i don't know about friction that acts which acts in a rough circular track,i would be really gratified if you can explain the entire phenomena and how this is different from static and limiting friction,or atleast some website or video lecture which explain this phenomena.
sir,i forgot to enter a sentence it is edited now.sorry for the inconvenience.
 
There are several possible interpretations of the OP. Is this kinetic friction from a stationary surface opposing the motion of a block sliding around under control of another force? Static friction from a rotating surface, holding a mass in place on the surface? Static friction on a wheeled vehicle driving in a circular path on a stationary surface? ...
 
haruspex said:
There are several possible interpretations of the OP. Is this kinetic friction from a stationary surface opposing the motion of a block sliding around under control of another force? Static friction from a rotating surface, holding a mass in place on the surface? Static friction on a wheeled vehicle driving in a circular path on a stationary surface? ...

thank you very much for replying,sir.i really don't understand the above cases,i would be really gratified if you could explain all the cases and the entire phenomenon of friction acting on a circular track.
by the way,the above question says about a car moving in a circular track,sir but please explain the entire phenomenon of friction acting on a circular track and please explain how is each case different from each other.or atleast suggest a website or video lecture which explain the phenomenon.
 
ajaysabarish said:
thank you very much for replying,sir.i really don't understand the above cases,i would be really gratified if you could explain all the cases and the entire phenomenon of friction acting on a circular track.
by the way,the above question says about a car moving in a circular track,sir but please explain the entire phenomenon of friction acting on a circular track and please explain how is each case different from each other.or atleast suggest a website or video lecture which explain the phenomenon.
For now, let's just work with the problem as given to you. (It would help if you were to provide the full text in the first place.)
You have a car following a circular track on level ground. You have two cases to consider: constant speed and varying speed.
Friction opposes relative motion of surfaces in contact. When a wheel rolls at steady speed in a straight line on level ground, there is no tendency for the rim (tyre, say) and ground to move relative to each other, so no frictional force.
Consider a car negotiating a curve at steady speed. Without friction, what would happen?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
781
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K