Discovering Binary Universe: Albert Einstein & Beyond

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a proposed theory called the "Binary Universe," which suggests the existence of a second universe (referred to as Universe B) that is linked to our own through the concepts of black holes and white holes. The theory is presented as an interpretation of spacetime and its properties, drawing on ideas attributed to Albert Einstein.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • A participant introduces the "Binary Universe" theory, claiming that if space is flat, it implies the existence of two universes, one being our own and the other (Universe B) containing white holes corresponding to black holes in our universe.
  • The theory posits that black holes trap light while white holes eject it, suggesting a direct relationship between phenomena in both universes.
  • Another participant challenges the theory by noting the lack of observational evidence for white holes and questions the explanatory power of the proposed ideas, asking for a mathematical formulation.
  • A later reply critiques the initial claims, stating that the interpretation of space as flat is misleading and emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of modern physics before proposing new hypotheses.
  • Another response reiterates the initial theory, emphasizing its claims without addressing the critiques raised.
  • Finally, a moderator closes the thread, stating that personal theories are not permitted in the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the "Binary Universe" theory, with some challenging its foundational assumptions and lack of empirical support. The discussion remains unresolved as the thread is closed without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the proposed theory, including the absence of mathematical backing and reliance on unverified concepts such as white holes. The critiques point to a broader context of established scientific understanding that the initial claims do not align with.

spacegeek101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have just regestered to tell the world of my amazing theory. I have called it, Binary universe. Albert Einstin said that everything puts a dent in spacetime. If sapce is flat, there is 2 sides witch means 2 universes. One is ours, an there's another one. I call it UB ( Universe B)
Black holes put a massive dent in time, not even light can escape. White holes make all light eject and no light can get to it. If the universe is flat, then on UB, where there is a black hole here, there's a white hole in UB. Its the same here, where there is a white hole here, there's a black hole in UB. Asteroids, comets, things fly out of white hole holes mistieriously. This theory explanes a lot. Another thing is, if there's a star somewhere in UB, there's white hole-like areas here.
 
Space news on Phys.org
No-one has ever observed a 'white-hole' in our universe, which by your theory means that the second universe must by neccessity be entirely white holes. What does it explain, and can you formulate your idea mathematically?
 
spacegeek101 said:
Hello. I have just regestered to tell the world of my amazing theory. I have called it, Binary universe. Albert Einstin said that everything puts a dent in spacetime. If sapce is flat, there is 2 sides witch means 2 universes. One is ours, an there's another one. I call it UB ( Universe B)
Black holes put a massive dent in time, not even light can escape. White holes make all light eject and no light can get to it. If the universe is flat, then on UB, where there is a black hole here, there's a white hole in UB. Its the same here, where there is a white hole here, there's a black hole in UB. Asteroids, comets, things fly out of white hole holes mistieriously. This theory explanes a lot. Another thing is, if there's a star somewhere in UB, there's white hole-like areas here.

Welcome to PF. I'm afraid you've made many errors in your interpretation of modern physics. Space is not flat, images of space as being flat are for explanatory purposes only, space is not literally a sheet with two sides.

I would advise learning some basic physics before trying to come up with hypothesis about the nature of the universe, the majority of practising physicists spend nearly ten years gaining degrees and a PhD before they really start applying themselves. It would be in your interest to read about what they have to say.
 
spacegeek101 said:
Hello. I have just regestered to tell the world of my amazing theory. I have called it, Binary universe. Albert Einstin said that everything puts a dent in spacetime. If sapce is flat, there is 2 sides witch means 2 universes. One is ours, an there's another one. I call it UB ( Universe B)
Black holes put a massive dent in time, not even light can escape. White holes make all light eject and no light can get to it. If the universe is flat, then on UB, where there is a black hole here, there's a white hole in UB. Its the same here, where there is a white hole here, there's a black hole in UB. Asteroids, comets, things fly out of white hole holes mistieriously. This theory explanes a lot. Another thing is, if there's a star somewhere in UB, there's white hole-like areas here.

Personal theories are not permitted here. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K